Draft:Olubunmi Onabanjo-Kuku

Olubunmi Onabanjo-Kuku (commonly known as Olubunmi Kuku) is a Nigerian aviation executive who serves as the Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer of the Federal Airports Authority of Nigeria (FAAN)^[1]. She was appointed to the position by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu in December 2023, becoming the first woman to hold the role.^[2]

Submission rejected on 16 April 2026 by Bonadea (talk). The subject does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The subject is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. Rejected by Bonadea 2 months ago. Last edited by Citation bot 2 months ago. Ask for advice

Submission declined on 16 April 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by ChrysGalley 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 15 April 2026 by 331dot (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by 331dot 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 15 April 2026 by ChrysGalley (talk). This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by ChrysGalley 2 months ago.

Submission declined on 15 April 2026 by Meadowlark (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that: provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis; are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight; are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content. Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia. This draft appears to contain text generated by a large language model (such as ChatGPT). You cannot use LLMs to generate article content. LLM-generated pages with certain obvious signs of being machine generated may be deleted without notice. These tools are prone to specific issues that violate our policies: hallucinations: they often invent false information and cite non-existent references. unencyclopedic tone: they tend to be vague, promotional, or essay-like, rather than neutral and factual. copyright issues: they may closely paraphrase existing text, leading to copyright violations. Instead, only summarize in your own words a range of independent, reliable, published sources that discuss the subject. See the advice page on large language models for more information. Declined by Meadowlark 2 months ago.

• Comment: Having helped the editor at #wikipedia-en-help, they may not have understood the difference between the edit button and the resubmit button; hence the repeated resubmissions. It's been suggested to them that they make all the improvements required, then follow the Ask for advice link to the AFC helpdesk. The editor has been clearly informed that if they do not make substantial improvements prior to doing this, the article will indeed be rejected and / or deleted. Jack Frost (talk) 11:17, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: As already noted, repeated resubmissions without any attempt to address the reasons why the draft was declined will eventually lead to rejection with no option to resubmit.
  There is no real claim to notability as Wikipedia defines it, and the multiple submissions have turned this into a time sink. bonadea contributions talk 10:53, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Stop using AI: it's that simple, it is not allowed. Twice now the logging information at the top of the draft have been removed, even though they are very clearly marked as "Do not remove this line". Humans wouldn't do this, AI does do this. The rest of the text is very much AI written. See WP:NEWLLM and WP:AIATTR
  If this happens again the next reviewer may well press the button marked "reject". ChrysGalley (talk) 10:28, 16 April 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Resubmitted without changes. Don't resubmit it until the concerns are addressed; you've already asked for advice, please wait until you get some. 331dot (talk) 13:54, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

• Comment: Please see WP:42 for more information on what kind of sources you need to show that your subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article, and select sources that show how she meets one of the criteria in WP:NBIO. In particular, interviews with or sources written by the subject (or their friends, family, colleagues, etc) are not considered independent.
  This draft appears to have been partly or entirely generated by an LLM, which is not permitted: see WP:NOLLM for more. Please rewrite the draft without using an LLM before resubmitting. Meadowlark (talk) 06:35, 15 April 2026 (UTC)