Draft:SAS Crown

SAS Crown
SAS Crown
	SAS Crown in May 2025
	Interactive map of the SAS Crown area
Record height
	Tallest in Hyderabad since 2024[I]
General information
Status	Structurally topped out
Type	Residential skyscrapers
Location	C82Q+HQR, Hyderabad, Telangana 500075, SAS Crown, Golden Mile Road, Kokapet, Hyderabad, Telangana 500075, 17°24'05.4"N 78°20'21.9"E
Coordinates	17.4015°N 78.3394°E
Topped-out	October 2024
Height
Height	235.3 metres (772 ft)
Technical details
Material	Concrete with partial glass facade
Floor count	58
Design and construction
Architects	Simón N.A.F., Aedas
Main contractor	SAS Infra
Website
	sasinfra.com/sas-crown/

SAS Crown is an under-construction residential multi-skyscraper project in Hyderabad, India.^[3]^[4] It consists of three towers, each rising to a height of 235.3 metres (772 ft).^[5]^[6]^[7] All three towers structurally topped out in October 2024 and became the tallest buildings in Hyderabad and South India, and were the 25th-tallest buildings in India at the time.^[8]^[9]^[10]

Submission declined on 24 June 2025 by Theroadislong (talk).

This draft's references do not show that the subject meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:

provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, not just brief mentions or routine announcements;
are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
are independent: not connected to the subject, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.

Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you have not resolved the issues listed above, your draft will be declined again and potentially deleted.
If you need extra help, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors.
Please do not remove reviewer comments or this notice until the submission is accepted.

Where to get help

If you need help editing or submitting your draft, please ask us a question at the AfC Help Desk or get live help from experienced editors. These venues are only for help with editing and the submission process, not to get reviews.
If you need feedback on your draft, or if the review is taking a lot of time, you can try asking for help on the talk page of a relevant WikiProject. Some WikiProjects are more active than others so a speedy reply is not guaranteed.

How to improve a draft

Wikipedia:Contributing to Wikipedia – a basic overview on how to edit Wikipedia.
Help:Wikitext – how to use the markup
Help:Referencing for beginners – how to include references
Wikipedia:Article development – how to develop your article
Wikipedia:Writing better articles – how to improve your article
Wikipedia:Verifiability – make sure your article includes reliable third-party sources

You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article.

Improving your odds of a speedy review

To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags.

Add tags to your draft

Editor resources

Easy tools: Citation bot (help) | Advanced: Fix bare URLs

Declined by Theroadislong 9 months ago. Last edited by Sawarijoshi 4 months ago. Reviewer: Inform author.

Resubmit

Please note that if the issues are not fixed, the draft will be declined again.

Submission declined on 24 June 2025 by Cinder painter (talk).

This draft is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Wikipedia's verifiability policy requires that all content be supported by reliable sources.

Reliable sources include: reputable newspapers, magazines, academic journals, and books from respected publishers.
Unacceptable sources include: personal blogs, social media, predatory publishers, most tabloids, and websites where anyone can contribute.

Replace any unreliable sources with high-quality sources. If you cannot find a reliable source for the material, it should be removed.

Declined by Cinder painter 9 months ago.

Comment: The sources are short press-announcements or releases and they do not address the topic with the necessary depth of coverage Cinder painter (talk) 06:37, 24 June 2025 (UTC)