Draft:Tanuj Mahashabde
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Submission declined on 14 December 2025 by Theroadislong (talk).
Where to get help
How to improve a draft
You can also browse Wikipedia:Featured articles and Wikipedia:Good articles to find examples of Wikipedia's best writing on topics similar to your proposed article. Improving your odds of a speedy review To improve your odds of a faster review, tag your draft with relevant WikiProject tags using the button below. This will let reviewers know a new draft has been submitted in their area of interest. For instance, if you wrote about a female astronomer, you would want to add the Biography, Astronomy, and Women scientists tags. Editor resources
|
| Submission declined on 21 July 2025 by S0091 (talk). This draft's references do not show that the person meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion for people. The draft requires multiple published secondary sources that:
Declined by S0091 8 months ago.
|
Comment: Most of this is based on interviews or routine coverage and suffers from WP:CITEKILL. It does not appear anything has changed since WP:Articles for deletion/Tanuj Mahashabde (3rd nomination). S0091 (talk) 16:36, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment: Does not meet WP:NACTOR as the subject is only known for one show and the sources are surrounded with about that one show only. The subject has had no significant roles in multiple notable films, television shows, stage performances, or other productions. RangersRus (talk) 13:05, 21 July 2025 (UTC)
Comment: I believe the subject meets the criteria under WP:NACTOR. I'm not declining it; I just want to hear the opinions of my fellow editors. Baqi:) (talk) 11:03, 20 July 2025 (UTC)


- provide significant coverage: discuss the person in detail, not brief mentions or interviews lacking independent analysis;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the person, such as interviews, press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Please add references that meet all three of these criteria. If none exist, the subject is not yet suitable for Wikipedia.