Draft talk:Winston Utomo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This draft must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the draft and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this draft, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This draft does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Request for review of rewritten draft
Hello, I have rewritten this draft with improved sourcing and neutral tone. The article now relies on multiple independent secondary sources.
I would appreciate a review to assess whether it meets notability and Wikipedia content guidelines.
Thank you. Dinimaharani4403 (talk) 10:29, 18 December 2025 (UTC)
Request for review of rewritten draft
Hello, I have rewritten this draft with improved sourcing and neutral tone. The article now relies on multiple independent secondary sources. I would appreciate a review to assess whether it meets notability and Wikipedia content guidelines. Thank you. Marcella Anindita (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2026 (UTC)
Request for review of rewritten draft
Hi @Greenman! Hope you're doing well.
Thank you for the advice about the draft of Winston Utomo [English Version]. I have revised this draft to improve its neutral tone and encyclopedic style, and to rely on multiple independent, reliable secondary sources. I would appreciate a review to assess whether it meets Wikipedia’s notability and content guidelines. Thank you.
Best Regrads, Cella Marcella Anindita (talk) 04:42, 26 January 2026 (UTC)
Request for review of rewritten draft
Hello @Youshouldchooseausernamethat, I have revised this draft to address previous feedback by adopting a more encyclopedic tone, reducing résumé-style content, and relying on independent secondary sources. I would appreciate a review to assess whether it now meets Wikipedia’s notability and content guidelines. Thank you. Marcella Anindita (talk) 07:33, 29 January 2026 (UTC)
Hello, could you specify which draft please. Thank you.
My apologies. I thought this was a user talk page as it appeared that way on my mobile view. Youshouldchooseausernamethat (Youshouldtalk) 20:54, 29 January 2026 (UTC)