Kutthaka
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Senevirad [1] Kutthaka | |
|---|---|
| General of The Anuradhapura Army | |
| Monarch | Sena I |
| Succeeded by | Ilanaga Sena |
| Monarch | Sena II |
| Monarch | Udaya I |
| Personal details | |
| Died | Anuradhapura, Sri Lanka |
| Occupation | Commander-in-chief |
| Military service | |
| Allegiance | |
| Branch/service | |
| Years of service | 853-889 |
| Rank | General |
| Battles/wars | Anuradhapura invasion of Pandya |
Kutthaka (fl. 9th century CE), also known in inscriptions as Senevirad Kuttha, was a distinguished general in the Anuradhapura army, serving under the King Sena II of the Anuradhapura Kingdom. He is best known for leading a disputed military expedition against the Pandyan Kingdom in South India.
Military career
Kutthaka served during the reigns of three kings as a senapati under Sena I (853), Sena II (853–887) and Udaya I (889).[3] Under Sena II, he was entrusted with the command of a large army to battle the hostile king Srimara Srivallabha of the Pandyan Kingdom.[4]
Pandyan Campaign
The Cūḷavaṃsa records that Sena II dispatched general Kutthaka to invade the Pandyan kingdom in coordination with a northern offensive by the Pallava ruler Nriputungavarman[5][6], creating a two-front conflict. As per culawamsa, Kutthaka advanced into South India, laid siege to the Pandyan capital Madurai, defeated the Pandyan king Srimara Srivallabha, captured and plundered the city, and recovered treasures previously taken from Sri Lanka including sacred and royal objects such as a golden Buddha image and ceremonial regalia, symbolizing both restitution and victory, after which he installed Varagunavarman II, son of the defeated king on the Pandyan throne on behalf of Sena II. After touring the Pandyan country, returned to Anuradhapura with the recovered treasures. [7][8]But the Culawamsa is a highly embellished and poetic account of the history of Ceylon and it persistently colours the account favourably to the Ceylonese kings and commanders to obscure the defeat of them. So it is done intended to obscure the defeat of Sena II. [9] [10] The Pandyan side of the evidence makes the ruling king Srimara Srivallabha successful in repelling a Maya Pandya and Sinhalese forces thus keeping his throne to himself at the end of the struggle.[11][12][13] [14]