Maztica Campaign Set

Douglas Niles and Tim Beach co-authored the campaign set.^[1] While the Forgotten Realms Campaign Set (1987) had mentioned other continents existed in Abeir-Toril, there were no additional details.^[2] Douglas Niles had "been working to get a Mesoamerican Realms supplement on the TSR schedule for a while. It was entirely in line with his previous development work for the Realms, when he'd created the Celtic-themed Moonshae Islands as one of the first additions the Realms. It took him two years, but he finally got the OK. First up he wrote a new trilogy of novels detailing the discovery of the new world: Ironhelm (1990), Viperhand (1990), and Feathered Dragon (1991). The Maztica Campaign Set then followed three months after the conclusion of the Maztica Trilogy".^[2]

The setting describes the new continent Maztica — the name "is a portmanteau of two Mesoamerican peoples: the Maya and the Aztec".^[2] On the development of the book, Niles said it is "thoroughly researched and historically accurate".^[2] Niles' research included tours of "numerous archaeological sites such as the Pyramids of the Sun and the Moon, Tchitchin Itza, and Uxmal" and "multiple trips to Mexico's National Museum of Archaeology".^[2] It was important to Niles to include crusaders from Faerûn as a fictional version of conquistadors – Niles said "I'd always thought the conquistadors were the closest-thing to a real-life D&D story. I just wanted to give the story a better ending".^[2]

In 2016, a PDF edition of the Maztica Campaign Set was released on the DMsGuild.^[2] In July 2020, Wizards of the Coast added a sensitivity disclaimer to legacy products for sale digitally.^[3] The disclaimer states:

We (Wizards) recognize that some of the legacy content available on this website does not reflect the values of the Dungeons & Dragons franchise today. Some older content may reflect ethnic, racial, and gender prejudice that were commonplace in American society at that time. These depictions were wrong then and are wrong today. This content is presented as it was originally created, because to do otherwise would be the same as claiming these prejudices never existed. Dungeons & Dragons teaches that diversity is a strength, and we strive to make our D&D products as welcoming and inclusive as possible. This part of our work will never end.

The disclaimer "appears twice on descriptions of D&D books that include content that resembles real-world cultures and races" such as the Maztica Campaign Set and Al-Qadim: Arabian Adventure books.^[3]

Keith H. Eisenbeis reviewed the Maztica Campaign Set in the February 1992 issue of White Wolf Magazine, giving the set an overall rating of 3 of 5.^[1] He remarked on TSR's trend of building campaigns based on its novels, noting that the set "succeeds admirably" in allowing those who have read them to continue to explore the setting.^[1] Eisenbeis also commented favorably on the description of the religious aspects of the setting (e.g., gods, priests, and afterlife).^[1] He noted as a potential problem the relatively little magic in the Maztica setting: a "group of low to mid level adventurers" imported from outside the continent could "wreak havoc".^[1] Eisenbeis concluded that the set "score[d] high for the role-player, moderately well for the problem solver and action seeker, and poorly for the power seekers".^[1]

In a retrospective review of Maztica Campaign Set in Black Gate, Scott Taylor said "Niles was challenged in this project to create a Mesoamerican world that mingles with the fantasy setting of the Forgotten Realms. In my opinion, after several so-so attempts at reading this set, he fails to deliver on what would make such a setting uniquely cool, ala demi-humans! The work tends to bog down in a kind of repetition of real-world conquistadors waging a campaign against indigenous peoples of the far south continents where the only change in the story line is that the priests actually had working magic."^[4]