Phaethornis
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Phaethornis | |
|---|---|
| Long-tailed Hermit Phaethornis superciliosus | |
| Scientific classification | |
| Kingdom: | Animalia |
| Phylum: | Chordata |
| Class: | Aves |
| Clade: | Strisores |
| Order: | Apodiformes |
| Family: | Trochilidae |
| Subfamily: | Phaethornithinae |
| Genus: | Phaethornis Swainson, 1827 |
| Type species | |
| Phaethornis superciliosus Linnaeus, 1766 | |
| Species | |
|
See text | |
| Synonyms | |
| |
Phaethornis is a genus of hummingbirds in the hermit subfamily, Phaethornithinae. They occur from southern Mexico, through Central America, to South America as far south as northern Argentina.
The genus Phaethornis was introduced in 1827 by William Swainson with the long-tailed hermit as the type species.[1] The name combines the Ancient Greek phaethōn meaning "sun" and ornis meaning "bird".[2] The genus now contains 27 species.[3]
The taxonomy of some groups have changed significantly in recent years, especially following the split of several small hermits (P. idaliae, P. atrimentalis and P. striigularis) previously considered subspecies of Phaethornis longuemareus, as well as the split of P. longirostris from P. superciliosus.[4]
Further confusion exists between P. superciliosus and P. malaris: Most taxa previously considered subspecies of the former (bolivianus, insolitus, margarettae, moorei and ochraceiventris) are now placed with the latter.[5] A fully satisfactory taxonomic treatment of the entire longirostris/malaris/superciliosus group is still lacking according to some Neotropical ornithologists.[6][7][8]
Another such case is P. maranhaoensis: Some[9] considered it invalid, believing it was the male plumage of P. nattereri. However, P. maranhaoensis only occurs in the northern part of the range of P. nattereri, and the two have different voices.[10] Molecular work also confirms the validity of P. maranhaoensis,[10] though details presently are lacking. Comparably, P. aethopyga has generally been considered invalid as believed to be a hybrid between P. ruber and P. rupurumii, but this assumption has recently been shown to be incorrect, leading to its revalidation as a distinct species.[11] For the same authors, the taxa proposed as hybrids by Hinkelmann,[12] could be valid taxa, especially P. longuemareus imatacae.