Talk:Alberto Jarrín

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information To-do list: ...
Close

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by History6042 talk 01:25, 4 July 2025 (UTC)

5x expanded by Arconning (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 54 past nominations.

Arconning (talk) 09:21, 1 July 2025 (UTC).

  • QPQ is done. Hook checks out in source and is interesting (although I would add the words "in a race" at the end of the hook for clarification). Earwig finds no copyvio. Page is long enough and was expanded 5x recently enough. Looks good! ArtemisiaGentileschiFan (talk) 20:52, 1 July 2025 (UTC)

"he 'challenged' a train traveling from Quito to Ibarra"

What makes Olympedia's stories reliable? And what makes it reliable in the context of supporting this rather exceptional claim to have run over 100 kilometres (62 mi) in 11 hours through mountainous terrain? Surely there are better sources available that can speak to such a feat (and publicity stunt). Ed [talk] [OMT] 07:48, 14 July 2025 (UTC)

I might also note that Empresa de Ferrocarriles Ecuatorianos says, with a source, that a railroad only reached Ibarra in 1929. So it's possible, but we need a better source that can speak to it. Ed [talk] [OMT] 07:52, 14 July 2025 (UTC)
@The ed17 Olympedia is owned by the International Olympic Committee and is managed by select Olympic historians. That's true, it'd be better if there's another sources that can strengthen the claim. Arconning (talk) 10:39, 15 July 2025 (UTC)
  • @Arconning: I did see that the IOC purchased the existing website, and I'm a little curious how that works with/against WP:SPS. My guess is that there's not much reason to distrust the statistics there. What I haven't seen is how they've put together the bio information like what they have on Jarrín, such as the sources they used. I'll bring it to WP:RSN to see if others have thoughts. Ed [talk] [OMT] 16:30, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Alberto Jarrín/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Arconning (talk · contribs) 08:56, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: PizzaKing13 (talk · contribs) 06:05, 23 August 2025 (UTC)


I'll do this review. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 06:05, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

@PizzaKing13 I believe I am done, no Spanish equivalent for the supposed wikilink. Arconning (talk) 15:00, 23 August 2025 (UTC)
@Arconning: Everything looks good. Congrats on the GA! PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 20:29, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Lead

  • "He set the national record" specify the Ecuadorian national record
  • "to run under four hours in the distance" → "to run the distance in under four hours"
  • "He was part of the first ever Ecuadorian delegation at the 1924 Summer Olympics." this sentence reads as if it was the first delegation at the 1924 Olympics like there were more delegations sent. Rephrase it to like "He was part of the first Ecuadorian delegation sent to the Summer Olympics in 1924."

Early life and education

  • Spot check 1a: Green tickY
  • Spot check 2a: Green tickY

Career

  • "He set a national record" specify the Ecuadorian national record
  • Spot check 1b: Green tickY
  • Spot check 1c: Green tickY

Sports administration and later years

  • No link for Ecuador National Games? On Spanish Wikipedia?
  • "due to a traffic accident" → "in a traffic accident"
  • Spot check 2b: Green tickY
  • Spot check 4a: Green tickY
  • Spot check 1e: Green tickY
  • Spot check 1f: Green tickY
  • Spot check 2d: Green tickY
  • Spot check 1h: Green tickY
  • Spot check 2e: Green tickY

Overall

  • Image is fine
  • No copyright vio per Earwig
  • Article is stable
  • Sources are reliable, assuming that Slate saying that Olympedia is "restricted to about two dozen trusted academics and researchers who specialize in Olympic history"
  • Article is neutral
  • Passed all spot checks
  • Stays on scope

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
    b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a. (reference section):
    b. (citations to reliable sources):
    c. (OR):
    d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a. (major aspects):
    b. (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
    b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

@Arconning: Article is in great shape! Just some minor grammar things and the review will pass. PizzaKing13 (¡Hablame!) 🍕👑 06:29, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Response to good article review

@PizzaKing13 and Arconning: I would like to respond to the good article review that was finished and archived before I could comment.

As a reader of this sports biography, I would expect some of the running times to be specified beyond "under four hours", especially when they were national records. Could this be added?

And I think the article's sourcing could be improved, as it heavily relies on two web pages, one of which is of Olympedia. This website has been questioned as a reliable source for biographical information, see Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard/Archive 485#Olympedia's biographical info. Are there any other sources available? – Editør (talk) 22:06, 23 August 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI