Talk:Americium
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The good article status of this article is being reassessed to determine whether the article meets the good article criteria. Please add comments to the reassessment page. Date: 01:40, 12 April 2026 (UTC) |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Americium has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article contains a translation of Americium from de.wikipedia. |
Pronunciation?
No explanation of the correct pronunciation. This would be a useful addition!
Solubility of americium trifluoride
Article review
GA Reassessment
Americium
- Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • • Most recent review
- Result pending
Uncited statements, especially in the "Isotopes" section. Z1720 (talk) 01:40, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- I'll take a look. If you could mark uncited statements with {{cn}}, that would be helpful for me. — hike395 (talk) 16:07, 12 April 2026 (UTC)
- I see some possible ENGVAR mixing. The article is tagged {{Use dmy dates}}, and that's what seems to be used in the body. That's British(ish). But the article is consistent with US "color" and "neighbor" types of spellings. DMacks (talk) 02:37, 13 April 2026 (UTC)
- MOS:DATETIES explicitly says that date format is independent of the national variety of English. Element articles are broad enough IMO that this topic is not so strongly American, so using DMY is fine. 1brianm7 (talk) 07:12, 15 April 2026 (UTC)
