Talk:Audiometry
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Audiometry.
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 26 January 2021 and 24 March 2021. Further details are available on the course page. Peer reviewers: MwalimuAfyaYaUmma.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 14:59, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Untitled
Isn't this covered in the "Pure Tone Audiometry" entry?
- If you mean the entire article, Pure tone audiometry is a sub-category of audiometry. If there is any confusion then the articles should be adjusted to reflect theses definitions. I have already updated the audiometrist page so I will have a look at this. Jodon1971 (talk) 11:15, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
- At first glance it seems much of the article on Pure tone audiometry should in fact be under Audiometry, as pure tone audiometry is only a specific type of audiometry. Much of the information given in the PTA article is not specific to PTA and is generally covered under Audiometry. It looks like both pages will require extensive modification in order to accommodate the correct definition. Alternatively it might be easier simply to retitle the PA page as Audiometry and make some minor additions, i.e. types, etc. and leave it at that. Audiology is the science of hearing, audiometry is the science of the measurement of hearing, and puretone audiometry is a specific type of measurement. I make my living as an audiometrist and I've also updated the incorrect definition used on that page previously. Jodon1971 (talk) 17:09, 16 January 2013 (UTC)
I think that the term distinguished speech ( link to Interpersonal communication in the fourth line of the lead section ) should be replaced by distinguish speech as it seems more appropriate in the given context
Anupama Srinivas (talk) 16:37, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
- Done! -- Jodon | Talk 19:22, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
ICD-10-PCS codes
Whilst I'm confident in the codes I've put, the actual range at F13Z may be wider. (I'm not an audiologist, and ICD-10-PCS is not used in the UK.)
(Also, the current ICD10 template used in the infobox links to the WHO website. I'll start a conversation for changing this over at Template:infobox medical intervention.) Little pob (talk) 23:27, 14 November 2015 (UTC)
