Talk:Back-to-Africa movement
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Great work
It's really great to see this article coming to life! futurebird 12:53, 15 October 2007 (UTC) -There are not even 1,000,000,000,000 in the world. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.219.149.38 (talk) 00:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
Comment
It's good to see that some Africans want to return to Africa, but the preposterously low quality of the language in the article as it exists now should perhaps be discouraged. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 212.226.31.86 (talk) 20:35, 8 October 2011 (UTC)
I fixed some grammar. Just basic things that were incorrect. — Preceding jmilam comment added by 17:46, 3 December 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmilam (talk • contribs)
NB Slavery did not become illegal in the United Kingdom in 1772 for two reasons, the United Kingdom did not exist until 1801, you are thinking, perhaps, England and Wales. Ireland was a separate Kingdom until that date and Scotland maintained a form of slavery with a tied workers law in coal mining until 1799. Secondly slavery did not become illegal--it had never actually been legal in England since the early Norman period a fact confirmed by several court cases including the Cartwright case of 1569, the 1706 ruling by Chief Justice Holt that prevented anyone suing for damages if a slave on English soil was "enticed" away from his master and the little known trial of Rex vs Stapylton presided over by Mansfield in 1771 where the jury convicted Stapylton for attempting to remove his slave/manservant to the West indies. Nor did the Somerset case have any real bearing on those black slaves brought to England, a judges comments do not make law. Officially, slavery became illegal in the whole of the United Kingdom in 1998 with the passage of the Human Rights Act. Gaptech (talk) 06:40, 30 May 2020 (UTC)
Stop trying to shoehorn in the "International African American Caucus"
Can certain posters stop trying to reference this organization, as these references totally lack any NPOV, have zero verification, pertain to a website with zero notability, and just seem to be an attempt to get attention for said website. if you want to advertise then go elsewhere, but inserting blatantly biased and unsourced propaganda is not needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.170.9.117 (talk) 21:14, 1 January 2012 (UTC)
There is a formatting derp in the United States of America section. I don't know how to solve it, but thought I'd mention it. 108.20.130.138 (talk) 19:42, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
Liberia
I'm a little confused on why there is a detailed sectioned on Liberia by itself, and then Liberia again farther down with only one sentence. Why are they separated? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmilam (talk • contribs) 10:24, 4 December 2012 (UTC)
- I've merged the Liberia sections, but the structure of this article still needs some work. Dialectric (talk) 04:10, 8 October 2013 (UTC)
Opening
Can anyone explain how the homeland link is related to his page, or is it just random? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jmilam (talk • contribs) 10:17, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
- The linked page was unrelated; I delinked homelands. Sometimes wiktionary links are used to help clarify uncommon words, but I think in this instance 'homelands' is understandable enough to stay unlinked. Dialectric (talk) 15:03, 7 October 2013 (UTC)


