Talk:Boozt

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information WikiProject Companies To-do:, Retailing To-do List: ...
Close

Comments left by AfC reviewers

  • Comment: There is still nothing about the Arbetsmiljöverket reports and criticism! bonadea contributions talk 10:10, 28 October 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment: Hello and thank you for this helpful note. I have carefully re-read WP:LLM and reviewed the draft in detail. I do not believe any artefacts remain, particularly as I only used ChatGPT marginally in drafting this article. I am therefore re-submitting this draft for review. Toometa (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment: In accordance with the Wikimedia Foundation's Terms of Use, I disclose that I have been paid by the company for my contributions to this article. Toometa (talk) 09:17, 29 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment: Contains references with "source=chatgpt.com" in the URL. I have made no judgement on the rest of the draft content, but since ChatGPT has been used in the creation of this draft you must read WP:LLM and carefully review all the content of the draft to check for hallucinations, unsubstantiated text, non-existent references.
    If you are sure that no ChatGPT artefacts remain, you can re-submit this draft for review. qcne (talk) 20:54, 28 August 2025 (UTC)
  • Comment: Awards that are not notable in themselves should not be included (and "Postnord logistics award" doesn't exactly inspire confidence!)
    I think Boozt may well be notable, but the draft is rather one-sided, with lots of minor details about run-of-the-mill matters, and nothing about the well-publicised criticism from Arbetsmiljöverket a couple of years ago, for instance. The staff list is irrelevant in an encyclopaedia article, and most of it has no source – where does the info about how long people have been with the company come from? (It makes no difference, because again, those details don't belong in the draft.) bonadea contributions talk 21:26, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI