Talk:Brahmi script

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Removal of Parent system

The parent source of Brahmi Script is not confirmed to be Proto-Sinaitic script or Phoenician alphabet or Aramaic alphabet, it can also be indigenous, therefore there is no confirmed source of Brahmi Script, removal of entire parent system is advised, or at least put valid citations.

I agree. Attesting a parent system can be controversial and literally misleading. Footy2000♡; 10:09, 18 June 2025 (UTC)
Adding support to the above.
The infobox listing Aramaic as the “Parent system” is not consistent with WP:V, WP:NPOV, and WP:UNDUE, as no modern scholarly consensus establishes an Aramaic → Brahmi derivation. Major surveys (Salomon 1995/1998; Falk 1993/2018; Trigger 2004) explicitly state that the origin remains uncertain; several scholars also argue for an indigenous or internal development.
Infoboxes should contain settled facts. Suggest changing parent_system= to “Origin: unknown” or removing the field entirely, with all hypotheses treated in the article body where they can be properly sourced. - Pipa3256 (talk) 21:49, 15 November 2025 (UTC)

Bhattiprolu?

Can someone explain this edit-war? —Tamfang (talk) 05:05, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Same Adiiitya (talk) 08:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
I guess that's a no. —Tamfang (talk) 20:21, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Max Weber

Isn't that his brother Alfred Weber? 141.20.217.196 (talk) 13:39, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Actually, it is Albrecht Weber (no relation, I think). I've corrected it - thanks for pointing this out. RegentsPark (comment) 13:52, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

Why is Sinhala shown as directly derived from Brahmi?

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI