Talk:Cervix

I propose that Cockscomb cervix be merged into Cervix#Anatomical abnormalities. CV9933 (talk) 13:40, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

• Yeah I think I'd support that. Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 14:29, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

• Support. Flyer22 Reborn (talk) 23:58, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

No objections after two weeks - Merge completed. CV9933 (talk) 14:33, 8 September 2018 (UTC)

hi, i am reading the fertility section and i am having trouble with its tone. In particular, its use of the term "quality". And the judgement of this said quality seems to derive from sites external to the woman. Moreover, most of the section is not cited. The citation that is given, i.e., 12 the question is directed to the person whose fertility is the topic, that is, the woman, which i discerned only from its title which uses 'your'. But in Wikipedia, this article, the judge is not the woman, but instead an other. As Wikipedia is supposed to be written from a neutral perspective (an impossibility!) this section is obviously not congruent to that Wikipedia policy. Instead, this article places the assessment of the "quality" of that which pertains to woman, to elsewhere, that is, an other than herself. *a cis woman growing a philosopher's beard MichelleGDyason 06:30, 29 March 2024 (UTC)

this page is about the cervix. females of mammals all have cervixes. so changing female to woman is limiting the topic to singly human. *a cis woman growing a philosopher's beard MichelleGDyason 01:32, 31 August 2025 (UTC)

Ssquamocolumnar junction (SCJ) appears to have its own page when hovering over the hyperlink, but it just points back to Cervix. 76.211.125.211 (talk) 04:20, 7 October 2025 (UTC)