Talk:Chapelizod

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chapelizod. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:52, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Chapelizod. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:48, 2 August 2017 (UTC)

"Suburb" / "Suburban village" / "Village" / "Town"

Hi. As recently discussed at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ireland#Describing Dublin's suburban/commuter towns, there is perhaps more than one way of describing Chapelizod. However, and by way of explanation for a recent series of edits, I would note that most sources appear to use "village" or "suburban village" or similar.

These include some sources which describe Chapelizod (or perhaps just its centre?) as a "village". Including:

However, there are far more refs (spanning a period from the 19th to the 21st century and including several authoritative sources) which describe it as a "suburban village". Including those linked in the article. For example:

Despite this unexplained recent addition, I can find no sources which justify its description as simply a "town". Unless there is specific reason for changing, the description we've had here for some time ("suburb (village core)" or "suburban village" or similar) seems more than supported by the refs. Personally I favour "suburban village". As that is perhaps most consistently used in multiple sources. Guliolopez (talk) 13:52, 15 March 2025 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI