Talk:Chogha Zanbil

@Ted hamiltun: Hello, The Elamite language is a linguistic isolate.^[1][2][3] so there is no specifically relation between Elamite Language and Arabic Language. please Undo my edits or I will reporting your action.

Gholaghabijan (talk) 15:45, 11 July 2019 (UTC)

@Gholaghabijan: he used a travel and personal book named "Right to Passage: Travels Through India, Pakistan and Iran By Zeeshan Khan" as the source. if he restores it again, than report him to admins immediately.188.158.112.88 (talk) 03:45, 12 July 2019 (UTC)

Some of this article is garbled. (1) "In the outer area are royal palaces, a funerary palace containing five subterranean royal tombs." This is an incomplete sentence. Is the funerary palace one of the royal palaces, or is it different from them? (2) In what language is the name "Chogha Zanbil"? The article is unclear but seems to suggest it is Persian, presumably modern Persian. In what language is the name "Dur Untash"? The article says the "original name" was Dur Untash and that is Assyrian. Since Elamite is not Assyrian, this makes no sense. (3) The statements that Elamite is a language isolate and the translation of "Chogha Zanbil" (from what language?) do not belong in the paragraph of history. I suggest a paragraph devoted to accurately and precisely giving the missing linguistic information, including the original name in Elamite, if possible, rather than Assyrian. Zaslav (talk) 08:04, 8 January 2020 (UTC)