Talk:Christianity in Iraq

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Original Research

This source,, National Geographic Magazine, does not state, Christians are suffering from lack of security since the invasion in 2003.. This article is about Christianity in Iraq, not Christians in the Levant.

Also, this sentence, The vast majority of them live in the capital Baghdad and in Mosul, is not supported by the National Geographic article.

Both have been tagged for requests for quotations. --Kansas Bear (talk) 02:57, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Christianity in Iraq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:15, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

Changes

The entire section was written for propaganda purposes. A lot of unreliable sources were added, such as AINA, personal essays, blogs etc. Majority of them were deleted. Also, the section contained a lot of unrelated parts, mainly copy-pasted directly from other sources. The article was probably a target of hostile user who wanted to spread anti-Kurdish propaganda. You are free to comment and propose more edits. Ferakp (talk) 19:56, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Please explain how AINA is unreliable source and Kurdish news sources such as RUDAW are not? If you think AINA is not reliable then RUDAW news sources must also be unreliable. Please do not remove material again on false pretext, and without explaining why the source is not reliable.  Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.92.17.129 (talk) 19:41, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Rudaw is also not a reliable source, you are free to delete all those sections which use Rudaw. AINA is absolutely not a reliable source, it has been discussed several times on Wikipedia. Read WP:RELIABILITY page to understand the criteria.Ferakp (talk) 23:15, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

Dear user 81.92.17.129.

Sources you add are unreliable and are not possible to user as sources. Also, many sections you have added are not sources at all and they need usually multiple reliable sources, as they are very high claims. Ferakp (talk) 10:24, 20 November 2016 (UTC)

Ethnicity and religion

It appears that there are editors who do not clearly understand the different concepts/categories of ethnicity on the one hand and of religious affiliation on the other hand. Kurds, Assyrians, Armenians, Arabs constitute ethnicities. "Christian", "Orthodox", "Syriac", "Catholic", "Chaldean", "Evangelical", "Muslim", "Sunni", "Shia" et al are terms for religious affiliation. While there apparently are empirical associations of concrete ethnicities with concrete religious affiliations, a serious article must not confuse the the two different concepts/categories. Please watch the language in editing. -- 2A1ZA (talk) 10:49, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Christianity in Iraq. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:50, 23 November 2016 (UTC)

Edits

The user added a lot of claims using unreliable sources such as AINA and Medium. Also, user involved in cherry picking and misinterpretation of sources. Majority of edits were against WP rules so, the only solution was restoring to the previous stable section. Thus, I ask the same user to use reliable sources and avoid cherry picking, misinterpretation of sources and removing sourced content. Ferakp (talk) 03:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)

Adding two more things to my comment: the user has also deliberately written claims that are not mentioned in his/her sources and also involved in WP:ORIGINAL.Ferakp (talk) 03:47, 11 December 2016 (UTC)
Please give examples of what is cherry picking. Without giving examples of where exactly there is a problem and why you are just vandalizing pages.
And AINA is not unreliable, see here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard/Archive_216#AINA_.28Assyrian_International_News_Agency.29

Please can you comment on the deletions of human rights issues by user Ferakp: @Attar-Aram syria: @Shadow4dark: @GGT: @Opdire657:@عمرو بن كلثوم:@Beshogur:@213.74.186.109:

AINA is just one of the sources you use, there are other sources like Medium.com.
One of your edit was duplicate.
Hasakah looting is using Medium.com as a source, which is not reliable. Another problem is that it's in Syria, not in Iraq which means it doesn't belong to this article.
Problem with your Helena Sawa paragraph is that, you didn't add everything(cherry picking). Your source says that the case is not solved and the another problem is that it's from 1998. When I added incidents to the article (for example to the Iraq section), I dropped all incidents that occurred before 2003. This is because Iraq before and after 2003 are not same. Also, incidents like this are less relevant than others. If I add similar incidents like this to the Iraq section, the article won't be readable anymore. That doesn't mean you can't add it to the article, you can add it by just simply making a new section for incidents before 2003 (my opinion).
Your The New York Times reported that after Christians had to flee.. edit is not related to the 2011 riots at all. It's not also supporting your claim. What you wrote is simply WP:ORIGINAL and cherry picking.
You have added an essay about 2011 Dohuk Riots while it has its own page 2011 Dohuk riots and it was already mentioned shortly.
You are cherry picking, involving in WP:ORIGINAL, deliberately misinterpreting sources and using unreliable sources. That's not all, you are pinging users who had previously problems with my edits(2015-2016) which means you have very likely been here for a while and either blocked or socketpuppeting.
Despite that, I am ready to help you with your edits.
Ferakp (talk) 00:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for the explanations. I will check about medium.com. Consensus is that AINA is reliable source (link above). Finding out about your previous conflicts with other users needs only a simple wikipedia search. --87.189.128.73 (talk) 19:27, 16 December 2016 (UTC)

Problems with newest changes

Needs to Be Flagged for NPOV

Rise of Islam

Some sections of this article are blatantly false

The consensus of the recent issue

Semi-protected edit request on 9 May 2024

Qaraqosh / Hamdaniya Wedding Fire Is Another Evidence for Persecution of Christians in Iraq

updated information

DNA

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI