Talk:Colorimetric analysis

Chemistry Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chemistry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of chemistry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChemistryWikipedia:WikiProject ChemistryTemplate:WikiProject ChemistryChemistry
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Molecular Biology: MCB

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of molecular biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Untitled

Part of this article was formerly at Color reaction. Biscuittin (talk) 12:11, 16 October 2010 (UTC)

Simplification

I have simplified the chemical reactions (e.g. by leaving out oxidation states) to make them more accessible to non-scientists. Have I overdone the simplification? Biscuittin (talk) 07:59, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Cuvettes are "required equipment"?

Plenty of colormetric assays that use 96-well format (not cuvettes), and even in the article, itself, it says an autoanalyzer can be used, but I believe those use a "flowcell", and not a cuvette, either. I don't know enough about the technical to change this, myself (is a 'flowcell' a TYPE of cuvette?- perhaps... I would definitely argue that a well is not a cuvette, but that's just my understanding, I don't speak for all industry). Humble appologies if I should have just changed it, myself... 23.24.214.46 (talk) 19:11, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Merge proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The result of this discussion was merge. No objections in 2 months. Mdewman6 (talk) 23:04, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

Colorimetry (chemical method) should be merged here, as the two topics are essentially the same. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:57, 16 December 2025 (UTC)

Mdewman6, there's no objection to this after a month and you should be good to carry out a WP:BOLDMERGE if you still think a merger is appropriate. Thebiguglyalien (talk) 🛸 02:40, 25 January 2026 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles