Wikiwand AI

Talk:Cranfield Airport

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information This article has not yet been checked against the criteria for B-class status:, This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status: ...
Close

Untitled

Article states that Cranfield cannot handle large airliners due to the runway length - the min length to fly a 737 is 1,524m which Cranfield exceeds - should this be altered? I know for sure they fly a BAe 146 out of there (Universities engineering dept. owned) because I've seen it!—Preceding unsigned comment added by 137.108.145.12 (talkcontribs) 2006-02-21

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cranfield Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:01, 2 December 2016 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cranfield Airport. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:53, 14 August 2017 (UTC)

Requested move 4 July 2026

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) Jeffrey34555 (talk) 06:42, 11 July 2026 (UTC)


Cranfield AirportLondon Cranfield AirportLondon Cranfield Airport – I am posting this on behalf of ~2026-38128-44 (talk · contribs) who said on their talk page please can you change the name of the article to "London Cranfield Airport", the changed content (rebranding) already has an existing citation/reliable source within the article: "In July 2026 the airport was rebranded as London Cranfield Airport.[2]" - 2. "Cranfield rebrands as 'London Cranfield Airport' in push for business aviation". Thanks. 10mmsocket (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2026 (UTC)

Oppose (for transparency I may have requested the rename on behalf of someone else but that doesn't mean I have to support it). In theory this could go 50:50 - Luton, Gatwick, Lydd and Oxford haven't been renamed "London....", but the Southend, Stansted and Biggin Hill articles have been. I think this is a marketing affectation, newly-done, and not yet widely reflected in the media. For now at least I think we should stick with the original per WP:COMMONNAME. --10mmsocket (talk) 20:24, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose as the wp:Common name is still Cranfield Airport and it will take a lot longer than an overnight press release to change that any time soon. Try again in 2036. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 20:33, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose even their website is not consistent at using "London Cranfield" ! Less than 50 miles from London and with excellent transport links to major UK cities, Cranfield Airport is an ideal destination for business customers that want to avoid the constraints of other airports. Turini2 (talk) 21:30, 4 July 2026 (UTC)
Oppose it is far too soon to make such a move based on a corporate rebrand only. 16:22, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
  • OS maps do show it as still "Cranfield Airport" so per WP:NAMECHANGES it might be a good idea to see when they change. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:27, 5 July 2026 (UTC)
    The OS has different criteria. If you are starting from a map and see an airfield, you might want to know its name: the OS is going to accept the owner's word for it and I woulkd assume that the OS gazetteer has both names. Wikipedia's criterion is set out in WP:COMMONNAME, it starts from the name that most visitors know and use. Possibly that will evolve in the years ahead, but not any time soon.
    London Cranfield Airport redirects here, so nobody (except maybe the marketing department ) is at a disadvantage. 𝕁𝕄𝔽 (talk) 14:57, 6 July 2026 (UTC)
    The OS would normally be authority for the common name rather than official name. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:46, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
    Says who? 10mmsocket (talk) 20:07, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
    WP:WIAN, the OS is the standard mapping for Great Britain. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:10, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
    Mapping maybe but the (sole) authoritative source for a licensed airfield would be NATS and the UK AIP, not its name on a map - to quote the link you gave a "disinterested, authoritative reference work" 10mmsocket (talk) 21:21, 7 July 2026 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks