Talk:Cyprus problem
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Cyprus problem article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives (index): 1, 2, 3, 4, 5Auto-archiving period: 3 months  |
 | This  level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg)
 | The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, use the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | Discussions on this page have often led to previous arguments being restated. Please read recent comments and look in the archives before commenting. |
 | This article is substantially duplicated in one or more external publications. Since these publication(s) copied Wikipedia, rather than the reverse, please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following sources: |
 | The content of Population exchange between Greek and Turkish Cypriots was merged into Cyprus problem on 24 May 2014. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
 | This article has previously been nominated to be moved. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination.
Discussions
|
linking to a related article I'm working on
hi all, this conflict is a major example of a topic I'm currently working on (protracted social conflict), so i added a link to that article in the intro. Grackle.cackle (talk) 19:12, 10 February 2024 (UTC)
Revelation of the facts on the ground
As for the fact revalation on the ground, Fiona Mullen of Sapienta Economics, a consultancy in Nicosia said "We might have reached a point where it’s no longer possible to put the island back together again". Source: https://www.economist.com/europe/2021/11/18/putting-cyprus-together-may-be-impossible Permanent partition? Putting Cyprus together may be impossible (18 November 2021). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.175.237.186 (talk) 21:07, 31 May 2024 (UTC)
was akrotiri and dhekelia UK bases when Cyprus gained independence in 1960?
ECtHR's decisions are NOT copyright-protected material and can be used EVERYWHERE just by SOURCING
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Here is the link: https://www.echr.coe.int/copyright-and-disclaimer
Copyright and Disclaimer
Website content
The portal and website of the European Court of Human Rights (“the Court”) are intended to provide PUBLIC ACCESS to information about the Court and its activities.
The Court hereby disclaims any liability or responsibility arising from the use of information or data contained on its website. The Court, its judges, members of the Registry and its contractors shall not be liable for any financial or other consequences whatsoever arising from the use of information or data contained on the website, including the inappropriate, improper or fraudulent use of such information or data. Consultation of the site shall automatically constitute full acceptance of the present disclaimer.
While the Court cannot guarantee that there are no errors on its site, it endeavours, where appropriate, to correct those which are drawn to its attention. The Court accepts no liability for the content of other Internet sites to which its portal is or may be linked or to which reference is or may be made.
The electronic version of the Court’s judgments and decisions is provided in order to ensure compliance with Article 44 § 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights, which provides that final judgments shall be published. However, it is not possible to guarantee that an electronic document faithfully reproduces a formally adopted text and the electronic version remains subject to editorial revision. The original signed text held in the Court’s archives is the authentic version. Moreover, until 2015, when a judgment or decision was published in the Court’s official series, Reports of Judgments and Decisions, the published version was to be regarded as the official version and governed any discrepancies between it and the electronic version.
Interpretation of hearings
The interpretation of the Court’s public hearings serves to facilitate communication and does not constitute an official record of proceedings. The original language version alone is authentic. No liability shall be incurred by interpreters in the exercise of their duties.
Reproduction of website content
Reproduction of texts and videos
The information and texts available on the Court’s website MAY BE REPRODUCED PROVIDED THE SOURCE IS ACKNOWLEDGED (© ECHR-CEDH) and the reproduction is made for private use or for the purposes of information and education in connection with the Court’s activities. This authorisation is subject to the condition that the source is indicated and that any such reproduction is free of charge.
PERSONS wishing to use information and texts on the Court’s website for any use OTHER THAN those listed above, and in particular for commercial use, must request prior written permission using the form available on the website.
Users should nevertheless be aware that certain information and texts may be protected under intellectual property law, in particular by copyright.
Reproduction of photos
Photos on the Court’s website remain the property of the Council of Europe and the European Court of Human Rights – they may be used on any medium provided the source is mentioned. All reproduction must necessarily provide the following credit: "Council of Europe".
Pictures taken by non-Council of Europe photographers may not be reproduced or transmitted without the photographer's written permission (contact details appear on the print version of the relevant pictures).
Such use must be free of charge and remain private in nature, or for the purposes of information and education in connection with the Court’s activities.
Reproduction of photos of the Human Rights Building
The name of the architects must be mentioned: Richard Rogers Partnership and Atelier Claude Bucher Architectes.
Diannaa, I am a
(i) "PERSON wishing to use information and texts on the Court’s website for any use listed above" and
(ii) NOT for commercial use.
ECtHR DOES ALLOW SUCH USAGE!, see above.
Diannaa, I am NOT
(i) a "PERSON wishing to use information and texts on the Court’s website for any use OTHER THAN those listed above" and
(ii) for commercial use.
ECtHR does NOT allow such usage, see above.
There is GIANT difference between these two! ~2026-14012-5 (talk) 10:04, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
~2026-14012-5 (talk) 10:17, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
Everywhere in Wikipedia, ECtHR's decisions are given just by sourcing
See, for example, among the others:
- List of ECHR cases concerning Article 10 in Turkey
- List of European Court of Human Rights judgments
- Article 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights
- List of Romani rights cases before international courts and quasi-judicial bodies
- Case of Hirsi Jamaa and Others v. Italy
- Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe
- M.C. and Others v Italy
I started "Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents" board case today about my complain on the Diannaa's misuse of her Wiki Admin rights, and for constant deletions of the NON-copyright-protected material:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#The_Wiki_Admin_User:Diannaa_constantly_deleting_the_SOURCED_text_of_the_ECtHR's_decisions_from_the_ECtHR's_official_website_although_ECtHR's_decisions_are_NOT_copyright-protected_material_and_can_be_used_EVERYWHERE_just_by_SOURCING ~2026-14012-5 (talk) 10:59, 25 January 2026 (UTC)
"Relevant court cases" section looks AI-generated
The "Courts of Countries" subsection incorrectly refers to the "Federal Court of the United States" and the "USA Court of Appeals" (these courts do not exist, the USA has multiple courts of appeals and even more federal district courts) and has suspicious use of bold text and bullet points.
It seems to have been reformatted on the 31st of July 2025: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cyprus_problem&diff=prev&oldid=1303495942. Before this revision, it correctly referred to the United States District Court for the District of Columbia. Noisytoot (talk) 21:04, 2 March 2026 (UTC)