Talk:Edwin Boxshall

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Good articleEdwin Boxshall has been listed as one of the Social sciences and society good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 11, 2025Good article nomineeListed
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 28, 2025.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Edwin Boxshall, described as Britain's longest-serving spy, was still advising the Foreign Office right up to the time of his death?
Close
More information Associated task forces: ...
Close

Nominator: Aeengath (talk · contribs) 08:44, 10 June 2025 (UTC)

GA review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Edwin Boxshall/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Dumelow (talk · contribs) 06:54, 11 October 2025 (UTC)


Happy to take a look at this one - Dumelow (talk) 06:54, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you for agreeing to review the article, much appreciated. -Aeengath (talk) 12:05, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

1. Well-written

Criteria: the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct; and it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.

  • I would consider moving the first sentence of the second paragraph of "Early life and First World War" to the third paragraph discussing the Military Mission cover as he wasn't commissioned until August 1917.
Done.
  • I would add a mention that Romania was originally neutral but joined the Allies in August 1916 to provide some context and that, although defeated, the part of Romania Boxshall was operating from wasn't occupied. I would also provide some context to the reader around the Russian Civil War and the Romanian military intervention in Bessarabia to explain what Boxshall was doing there.
Done. Added context with two sources to support (Hall and Clodfelter).
  • "He has been described as one of the longest-serving officers in British intelligence history", I would attribute this statement in the article ("...described by XXXXXX as ...") to avoid any potential issues wiuth MOS:AWW.
    • Done.
  • I would provide a link to 1945 Birthday Honours in relation to his MBE
Done.

2. Verifiable with no original research

Criteria: it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline; reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose); it contains no original research; and it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.

  • Missing a citation after "Boxshall was succeeded as the Foreign Office’s SOE Adviser by Christopher M. Woods followed by Gervase Cowell"
Done. Added missing sfn
  • You mention his 1947 divorce in the infobox but it is not cited and not mentioned in the article
Done. Added per Davenport
  • His rank of lt-col is mentioned only in the infobox and uncited
Done.
  • The introduction to Who's who in Central and East-Europe states that the information contained was gathered form the subjects. I think, therefore, that you should be treating it as an WP:SPS, I don't think you should state eg. that he held the honours listed on this basis. You could, though say "his entry in teh 1935 Who's who in Central and East-Europe stated that he held..."
Done.
  • Spot checks:
"He developed a wide network of influential contacts, including arms magnate Sir Basil Zaharoff, whose support helped legitimise his commercial role" checks out to Bennett 2012, p. 166.
"During this time, he was instrumental in brokering military-industrial contracts, including the sale of submarine equipment to the Romanian Navy." checks out to Deletant 2016, p. xi.
MBE checks out to the Gazette
Noted, thank you for verifying.

3. Broad in its coverage

Criteria: it addresses the main aspects of the topic; and it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).

Consider adding the following from the London Gazette:

The first quarter 1942 list show he was promoted to the war substantive rank of lieutenant on 29 August 1941 and held the temporary rank of captain from 29 November 1942.
The 1st quarter 1945 Army List shows promotion to the war substantive rank of captain on 21 August 1942 and the temporary rank of major on the same date.
The first quarter 1946 list shows he became a war substantive major on 1 November 1945 and temporary rank of lt-col on the same date
Done. Added verified London Gazette and Army List citations with a new Military commissions section summarising confirmed ranks and promotion dates (1917–1945).

4. Neutral

Criteria: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.

Resolved

I found no issues with WP:NPOV

5. Stable

Criteria: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.

Resolved

No disputes evident in page history or on talk page

6. Illustrated

Criteria: media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content; and media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.

  • There is a photo on Getty that could be cropped and used under a fair use tag
Done. Added 1979 Getty image of Boxshall under fair-use rationale with appropriate caption and licensing details.


Good work! Passing this for GA - Dumelow (talk) 13:52, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Thank you @Dumelow, appreciate your time and detailed feedback. -Aeengath (talk) 14:59, 11 October 2025 (UTC)

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by TechnoSquirrel69 (talk) 20:19, 23 November 2025 (UTC)

  • ... that Edwin Boxshall, believed to be Britain’s longest-serving spy, was still advising MI6 at 86?
Source: Deacon, Richard (1989). Spyclopaedia: An Encyclopaedia of Spies, Secret Services, Operations, Jargon and All Subjects Related to the World of Espionage. Little, Brown Book Group Limited. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-7088-4220-1.
    • Reviewed:
Improved to Good Article status by Aeengath (talk). Number of QPQs required: 0. Nominator has fewer than 5 past nominations.

Aeengath (talk) 18:22, 11 October 2025 (UTC).

    More information General: Article is new enough and long enough ...
    General: Article is new enough and long enough
    Close
    More information Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems ...
    Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems
    Close
    More information Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation ...
    Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation
    Close
    QPQ: None required.

    Overall: Interesting article nominated on same day as promoted to GA. Couple of comments on the hook. The article doesn't literally say anywhere, as the hook, does, that he was still advising at 86 - it says he was advising at time of death which elsewhere is stated to be 86. But I think it would be too pedantic to question that. I can't actually access the source that's cited for the hook but AGF'ing, especially as it's supported in the article by a second source, Bennett, which I could access. (There's a slight discrepancy with the age in Bennett as that says 87 not 86. But it seems clear that Bennet made an understandable mistake as Boxshall died 9 days short of his 87th birthday. Bennett also calls him Edward. But it's obviously the same person and I noticed that some of the other sources called him Edward.) DeCausa (talk) 11:33, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

    @DeCausa: Thanks very much for the review! I’ve now added a 1979 Daily Telegraph to the article confirming that Boxshall was still advising the Foreign Office at age 82, this may be a safer choice.
    Source: Comfort, Nicholas (25 July 1979). "SOE expert still working at 82". The Daily Telegraph. p. 19. Retrieved 1 November 2025 via Newspapers.com.
    • ALT2: ... that Edwin Boxshall, described as Britain’s longest-serving spy, was still advising the Foreign Office right up to the time of his death?
    Source: Deacon, Richard (1989). Spyclopaedia: An Encyclopaedia of Spies, Secret Services, Operations, Jargon and All Subjects Related to the World of Espionage. Little, Brown Book Group Limited. p. 166. ISBN 978-0-7088-4220-1. Boxhall spent longer in Britain's Secret Service than probably any other man in history and was still being consulted on some of its affairs right up to the time of his death.

    -Aeengath (talk) 14:32, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

    , Thanks Aeengath (talk · contribs), I'm approving the original. The Deacon quote supports it. DeCausa (talk) 17:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)
    @DeCausa: Thanks for the approval! -Aeengath (talk) 18:06, 1 November 2025 (UTC)

    Related Articles

    Wikiwand AI