Talk:Fiorello La Guardia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fiorello La Guardia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 12 months |
| This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article was the subject of an educational assignment in 2013 Q1. Further details were available on the "Education Program:St. John's University/Discover New York 570 (Spring 2013)" page, which is now unavailable on the wiki. |
The narrative is a train wreck of discontinuity
POV problems
This article is extremely promotional in its tone. Just look at the lead: "La Guardia revitalized New York City and restored public faith in City Hall." Single-handedly? "His administration engaged new groups that had been kept out of the political system, gave New York its modern infrastructure, and raised expectations of new levels of urban possibility." That last part is awfully broad. Then there's this in the body "La Guardia was a tireless and vocal champion of progressive causes". A champion? Awfully strong word to be used in such a declarative sense. -Indy beetle (talk) 06:04, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- I fixed the lead. Nothing yet to the body, though it does need some work as well. epicgenius (talk) 17:03, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
I think this is incorrect. It is pretty consensus that La Guardia was a quality mayor and those sentences if you know the history are not broad. I am new to wikipedia though.Joco179 (talk) 02:30, 1 February 2021 (UTC)
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Fiorello H. La Guardia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121210063910/http://www.laguardiawagnerarchive.lagcc.cuny.edu/Advanced_Search.aspx?ViwType=1&ColID=1 to http://www.laguardiawagnerarchive.lagcc.cuny.edu/Advanced_Search.aspx?ViwType=1&ColID=1
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


