Talk:Floating charge
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | The content of Qualifying floating charge was merged into Floating charge on 3 March 2026. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. For the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Floating charge article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Re-write
Did a bit of a re-write on this article. Apologies if I have trampled on anyone's toes, but this article looked like it needed love, and hadn't had any in a long time. Legis 13:33, 22 August 2006 (UTC)
Aus & NZ
I was reading Getzler & Payne, Company Charges - Spectrum and Beyond (ISBN 0-19-929993-5) and in the foreword Lord Millett claims that the floating charge has been abolished in Australia and New Zealand. Is that correct? --Legis (talk - contributions) 16:23, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
Merge proposal
I propose merging Qualifying floating charge into Floating charge. I think the content in 'Qualifying floating charge' can easily be explained in the context of this article, and merging them would not cause any article-size or weighting problems. Duncnbiscuit (talk) 06:10, 13 January 2026 (UTC)
