Talk:Imperial Regalia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Imperial Regalia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| This page incorporates content from de:Reichskleinodien, a page hosted on another Wikimedia Foundation project. Please consult the history of the original page to see a list of its authors. |
Laws
good golly Ms. Dolly... can someone please help me out with this page maybe? I translated most of the text from the German version (this is completely legal, right?) if not i apologise. but i don´t have enough time right now to do this alone.... cheers!
User:antares911 15:10, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
Disambiguation?
Should this instead be a disambiguation page for Imperial Regalia of Japan and Imperial Regalia of the Holy Roman Empire? Nik42 04:36, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
- Err...Japan was not part of the Holy Roman Empire, no matter how much any Japanese person may have wished it to be so. Now, during WW II there was a certain...uh, relationship that existed. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.111.118.28 (talk) 17:30, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Sword of Charlemagne
The 'Saber of Charlemagne' misdirects to 'Joyeuse' which is the French coronation sword (note the painting of Louis XIV wearing it) and has never been a part of the Imperial Regalia. Joyeuse is a broadsword and the Saber of Charlemagne is a saber, very early, probably of 10th or 11th century Magyar origin. It's origin is unknown; possibly a gift from one of the Arpads to one of the Saxon or Salian emperors.67.52.199.50 (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 06:14, 23 December 2010 (UTC).
Requested move 14 April 2026
| It has been proposed in this section that Imperial Regalia be renamed and moved to Holy Roman Imperial Regalia. A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}}. Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Imperial Regalia → Holy Roman Imperial Regalia or Imperial Regalia of the Holy Roman Empire – Current title is not precise and ambiguous with other empire's regalia —blindlynx 13:41, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
- Change to something. Regalia of the Holy Roman Emperor is simplest and best. Johnbod (talk) 14:11, 14 April 2026 (UTC)
- Support Regalia of the Holy Roman Emperor per above.--Ortizesp (talk) 19:19, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Oppose, but would support Regalia of the Holy Roman Emperor. Not sure if that's better than Imperial Regalia of the Holy Roman Empire, which is consistent with other articles. Srnec (talk) 19:16, 18 April 2026 (UTC)
- Support Imperial Regalia of the Holy Roman Empire. We do need the "Imperial" in there as it's part of the common name:
in German Reichskleinodien, Reichsinsignien or Reichsschatz
. Imperial Regalia by itself is clearly ambiguous, however, as every empire has imperial regalia. -- Necrothesp (talk) 10:30, 20 April 2026 (UTC)
