Talk:Irish lace

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

References

I have added a few references to the Irish Lace page. It needs much more work,ie.The other Irish Laces need to be added. I wil do this when I get the time, or anybody else, feel free to do so.Noraslace (talk) 00:00, 26 November 2009 (UTC)

I also want to add after reading your comments below that, yes I want to promote Kenmare Lace, it was one of the most important needle point laces of its generation but there is very little information on it on the web. I'm trying to put that information out there but am not used to the way that wiki operates and yes I got very frustrated when my content kept getting removed. I'm simply trying to inform people about something that is a part of my home town's heritage and what I have written so far has been completely factual. In addition to this I have at no point tried to portray it as the dominant lace in any catagory. I have simply been including it in places where it only rightly deserves a mention. In relation to the Irish Crochet lace thing. You are Wrong. Irish Crochet lace is actually different from Normal Crochet lace. it uses a much finer hook and thread and is constructed on a special type of fabric. It is nothing to do with the fact that it is irish crochet. Irish Crochet is the name given to this type of lace. I am sorry to hear that you are so worried but if you worked with me instead of simply removing my content then I'm sure that would be a more constructive approach. Finmix (talk) 21:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC) Finmix Finmix (talk) 21:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

That's because the edits have been promotional in tone and have linked to only one website Surely if this is such an important kind of lace there would be many sources of information about it. Scholarly book references are usually ideal, when they're possible. For an example of the kind of tone and referencing we strive for, see Sprang. Durova366 21:45, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

finmix

My mother is going to update directly herself, as she is the expert, I think it would be better if she explained herself. we should have an update for you here tomorrow

82.141.218.147 (talk) 08:58, 18 November 2009 (UTC)finmix82.141.218.147 (talk) 08:58, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

I think your comments are very unfair, is there some method for deciding what is or is not a worthy lace? Most of the information on Kenmare Lace was published a hundred years ago before the exisitance of the internet hence why there is not a lot on the web but in answer to your statment which I feel is very condescending "Surely if this is such an important kind of lace there would be many sources of information about it." you can still easily see plenty of references to it in Google Books for example: http://books.google.com/books?ei=nKsBS4OPB4KA4Qb495z0Cw&ct=result&q=kenmare+lace+history&btnG=Search+Books Finmix (talk) 19:52, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

There's been no objection to your development of the Kenmare Lace article. But Wikipedia has a no original research policy. Your creation of this article appears to be asserting that Irish laces of all types have some unifying characteristic that distinguishes them from laces in all other countries. Is that a repetition of a scholarly theory or is it your own opinion? If the latter, then Wikipedia shouldn't be the first point of publication. Durova366 21:44, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Merge proposal

ORIGIN

History

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI