Talk:Jesselyn Radack

Much of the article has been focused on stating things that the subject has claimed or believed, to the degree that it seems to be being built to make her argument, which is not the goal of Wikipedia. I've been trimming out particularly those sourced to Radack's court filings. Court filings are not reliable independent secondary sources; they are primary sources for the claims being made, but even then we would rely on an independent secondary source to show us which claims are being made of interest (correction made November 28, 2024). They aren't even particularly good statements for what Radack believes, as a court document is not intended to be a full statement of belief but rather than argument being made to pursue an interest in a case. Others should keep an eye on peeling this back. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 15:40, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

@JusticeDelayedButNotDenied: You have inserted IMDb as a source. As you can see at WP:IMDb, that site has been repeatedly judged not to be a reliable source for our purposes. I have again undone the addition.

I will also note that the introduction to the article is intended to be a summary of the article below; the material on Silenced is not below, but should be moved there. -- Nat Gertler (talk) 14:49, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

Thanks for your guidance. I will do that. JusticeDelayedButNotDenied (talk) 08:06, 29 November 2024 (UTC)