 | This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
1.) I would like to add missing content in "Black hat link building".
Suggested Content:
"Exploiting [Domains]: Black hat SEO [] may acquire expired domains that have existing backlinks and [] them to their own [] to [] [engine] []. This [] aims to inherit the link equity of the expired domain. However, search engines may penalize such practices if deemed manipulative."
2.) I would like to propose adding a new section titled "Grey Hat link building" between the "White Hat" and "Black Hat" sections in the Link Building article. This section would bridge the gap between ethical and unethical practices, offering a more complete perspective.
Suggested Content:
"[hat|Grey hat] link building [] occupy the middle ground between white hat and black hat practices. These [] aim to achieve faster results than purely white hat strategies without being as [] or manipulative as black hat techniques. While grey hat methods may not directly [] search engine guidelines, they often [] loopholes that could lead to penalties if [].
Examples of grey hat techniques include:
Purchasing expired domains with [] [] and [] them for new [].
Creating Private [] [] (PBNs) where the intent is to [] link equity without full [].
Using automated [] to [] link-building [] while [] a human-like [].
Offering [], such as free [] or [], in [] for backlinks without explicitly violating search engine [].
While these techniques can [] significant short-term [] in terms of rankings, they carry risks. Search engines frequently [] their [] to close [], and grey hat [] can lead to penalties or [] of [] if deemed manipulative. Website [] often use these methods cautiously, aiming to [] a [] between [] and [] with search engine []."
3.) Reference to Add:
[1] Mescaronn (talk) 16:06, 23 December 2024 (UTC)
Not done for now: I would like you to have references included in your text and some more of them. We won't be adding a section on grey hat unless there are reliable sources about it. Ultraodan (talk) 13:34, 27 December 2024 (UTC)
- Not done for now @Mescaronn: Please have a look at the text above – it is currently unreadable because you have misunderstood how to link to other Wikipedia pages (please follow that link which leads to a help page explaining how to do that). In any case, there are still no sources, as the flyrank.com link doesn't support most of the claims, and flyrank.com is clearly not a source that could be used anyway. --bonadea contributions talk 20:09, 23 January 2025 (UTC)
