Talk:Long ball
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was no move. JPG-GR (talk) 04:18, 24 September 2008 (UTC)
- Long ball → Long ball (association football) —(Discuss)— This move would prevent acchistory pidental linking from other ball games such as field hockey, Amercian football, Lacrosse etc. --Lucy-marie (talk) 13:49, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. There is no confusion. The primary term is the football play, and all incoming links are from football articles. Please see WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:01, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Comment There is a need for this because for example if I am wantin to create a similar page regarding the use the long ball in Australian Rules football. I would either have to add to this article, which is all about Association football or create a new article dedicated to the Australian Rules use. THe new pae would have to have a Dab in the title. I would though not be able to move this page to the necessary Dab title due to a redirect being in the way. Also a disambiuation page could not be created without destroying the history of this page. Clarity in the titles of articles are necessary to prevent future problems from occuring. Finally just beacuse other stuff dosent exist yet it should not prevent title clarity from occuring.--Lucy-marie (talk) 14:15, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- So create the new article first: we don't name articles based on what may exist in the future, because we don't yet know what will happen in the future. And the footy article is still the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- It would only be primary in specific parts of teh world eg not North America or Australia.--Lucy-marie (talk) 15:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- So create the new article first: we don't name articles based on what may exist in the future, because we don't yet know what will happen in the future. And the footy article is still the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. Chris Cunningham (not at work) - talk 14:52, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- Oppose. No need for a disambiguator if there are no pages to disambiguate. When there is a page about Australian football, this can be reassessed. 128.232.1.193 (talk) 18:54, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.