Talk:Meditation (Maryon)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | Meditation (Maryon) is currently an Art and architecture good article nominee. Nominated by Usernameunique (talk) at 19:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review this article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor. When complete, this review will be closed by the reviewer. To view the review and add comments, click discuss review. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | A fact from Meditation (Maryon) appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 16 May 2026 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. Track your hook after promotion. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by RandomEditsForWhenIRemember (talk) 17:52, 9 May 2026 (UTC)
( )
Meditation (1910) by Edith Maryon
- ... that Edith Maryon's 1910 sculpture Meditation (pictured) was made in at least three media?
- Source: Raab 1993: Plaster. Clay et al. 1999: Gilt plaster. East Bristol 2019: Bronze.
Usernameunique (talk) 20:11, 16 April 2026 (UTC).
Interesting sculpture with a quirky name, on fine sources, no copyvio obvious. The image is licensed and a must, - without it, we'd have to describe it. I guess the caption could simply be Meditation, but let the promoter decide. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:29, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
- Thanks as always, Gerda Arendt. --Usernameunique (talk) 20:35, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
Nominator: Usernameunique (talk · contribs) 19:58, 16 April 2026 (UTC)
GA review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Meditation (Maryon)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: MSincccc (talk · contribs) 18:23, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- Comments to follow. We should be able to wrap it up this week. Best, MSincccc (talk) 18:23, 10 August 2026 (UTC)
- GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability):
b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
- a (prose, spelling, grammar, and understandability):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
- a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
