Talk:Plandemic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Plandemic article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 30 days |
|
| This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (center, color, defense, realize, traveled) and some terms may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
| Plandemic has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| The contentious topics procedure applies to this article. This article relates to pseudoscience and fringe science. Editors who repeatedly or seriously fail to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, any expected standards of behaviour, or any normal editorial process may be blocked or restricted by an administrator. |
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 22:32, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that BuzzFeed News compared the conspiracy film Plandemic: Indoctornation (logo pictured) with Jurassic World: Fallen Kingdom and Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker? Source: https://www.buzzfeednews.com/article/janelytvynenko/plandemic-sequel-review
- ALT1:... that Plandemic was criticized for its professional-style production? Source: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2020/may/14/plandemic-movie-discredited-dr-doctor-judy-mikovits-how-debunked-conspiracy-theory-film-went-viral
Improved to Good Article status by Gerald Waldo Luis (talk). Self-nominated at 03:08, 15 March 2021 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Looks good. Either hook could be used, but my preference is ALT1. It's so surprising, I had to read it twice – very "hooky". —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 17:50, 17 March 2021 (UTC)
Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 15 March 2026
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Please change
<ref name="HF">{{Cite web|date=March 30, 2020|editor-last=Teoh|editor-first=Flora|title=Claim that flu vaccine increases coronavirus infection is unsupported, misinterprets scientific studies|url=https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/claim-that-flu-vaccine-increases-coronavirus-infection-is-unsupported-misinterprets-scientific-studies/|access-date=May 8, 2020|website=Health Feedback|publisher=Science Feedback|archive-date=May 8, 2020|archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20200508002938/https://healthfeedback.org/claimreview/claim-that-flu-vaccine-increases-coronavirus-infection-is-unsupported-misinterprets-scientific-studies/|url-status=live}}</ref>
to
<ref name="HF">{{Cite web|date=March 30, 2020 |editor-last=Teoh |editor-first=Flora |title=Claim that flu vaccine increases coronavirus infection is unsupported, misinterprets scientific studies |url=https://science.feedback.org/review/claim-that-flu-vaccine-increases-coronavirus-infection-is-unsupported-misinterprets-scientific-studies/ |access-date=March 15, 2026 |website=Health Feedback |publisher=[[Climate Feedback|Science Feedback]] |archive-date=January 4, 2026 |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260104170306/https://science.feedback.org/review/claim-that-flu-vaccine-increases-coronavirus-infection-is-unsupported-misinterprets-scientific-studies/ |url-status=live}}</ref>
ChaetoLv (talk) 01:44, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
- The reason for this request is that the content on the former Health Feedback URL (healthfeedback.org) has been replaced with spam. ChaetoLv (talk) 01:45, 15 March 2026 (UTC)
Done as with the previous request (thank you for adding archive link too) ―Maltazarian (talkinvestigate) 01:57, 15 March 2026 (UTC)



