Talk:Rachael Ray
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Rachael Ray article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the subject of the article. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
| Archives: 1 |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to multiple WikiProjects. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
.jpg){kind=small}
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 September 2018 and 16 December 2018. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Alanderson3.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 07:42, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Birthplace
Cape Cod or Glens Falls? Past discussions indicate it's Glens Falls. --Ronz (talk) 19:46, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
Chronology or Article?
I just read this "article" for the first time, and I noticed that it seems to written more like a chronology than an encyclopedia article. There doesn't seem to any flow to it, and most sentences have dates with an occurrence of something. Has anyone else noticed this? 74.107.146.22 (talk) 20:37, 14 September 2010 (UTC)
Age
Rachel Ray said on an episode of her daytime talk show (when Jennifer Anniston was on) that she is 43 years old, not 42. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.133.18 (talk) 20:06, 16 February 2011 (UTC)
EDIT: SOURCE ADDED:
http://www.accesshollywood.com/jennifer-aniston-reveals-ageism-concerns-admits-to-protesting-frog-dissection-as-a-teen_article_43899
It says it in the text, but also if you watch the video, you clearly see Rachel say she is 43. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 99.240.133.18 (talk) 02:54, 17 February 2011 (UTC)
Photos
Those 2 photos of Ms. Ray, esp. the first one, make her look very unattractive and noticeably overweight, yet she's been rated among the most attractive women in the US. I know that photos are not as accurate or consistent as they might appear to be, but if these are representative, she's a dog and a half. If they are not, this article needs to change them. Bostoner (talk) 03:11, 8 March 2011 (UTC)
Husband cheated on her
Her husband was unfaithful to her and no one bothered to post it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Majinsnake (talk • contribs) 10:37, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- So a blog says this claim (ie, unsubstantiated and unconfirmed) comes from "... an interview with the National Enquirer", quite the paragon of high quality reporting. Really tops out on the reliability scale, no? This arguably shouldn't even be on the talk page. Gimmetoo (talk) 11:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)
- If it weren't real, than it should still have be posted as "False news" or something. If it shouldn't be on the talk page, than you implied that it should be on her actual page. Thanks Majinsnake (talk 31, MAY 2011 (UTC)
BS posted somewhere does not get elevated to "False News" and automatically get a place in the article, otherwise we would all be living in a "garbage-ocracy". If it was all over the press, and then proven false, that would be different.69.171.160.235 (talk) 13:05, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
- People have "bothered to post it" but someone, "Gimmetoo," keeps taking it down even after the Daily Mail in the UK reported on it. Gimmetoo seems to have a reason for what he/she/it is doing, but Rachael made her husband news when she broadcast her wedding. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 198.232.250.44 (talk) 17:50, 30 January 2013
- What you're trying to add is 1) from an unnamed source, 2) identified as a "sensational claim", 3) is a claim, not oonfirmed. All that makes it inappropriate per WP:BLP. Even if it were properly sourced to a reliable source with appropriate journalistic levels of confirmation, the info is about her husband, not her. She is the focus of this article. Gimmetoo (talk) 17:42, 31 January 2013 (UTC)