Talk:Ryan Clayton
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Ryan Clayton has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
( )
- ... that actor Ryan Clayton has been boxing since he was 11 years old?
- ALT1: ... that actor Ryan Clayton joked that he played various villains in productions due to his eyes or hair? Source:
- ALT2: ... that actor Ryan Clayton was watching a film about Manchester City when he got a call to return to act in Coronation Street? Source:
- ALT3: ... that actor Ryan Clayton did research into the impacts of fostering children for his storyline on Waterloo Road? Source:
- ALT4: ... that actor Ryan Clayton said that Waterloo Road reminded him of what people were like when he was in school? Source:
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Rachel Henning and Template:Did you know nominations/Gennady Trifonov
Improved to Good Article status by DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 56 past nominations.
DaniloDaysOfOurLives (talk) 17:06, 18 June 2026 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, well-sourced, neutral, no issue regarding prose, hook is interesting (alt 0), in the article and cited. QPQ is done. GTG. Warm Regards, Miminity (Talk?) (me contribs) 02:28, 27 June 2026 (UTC)
- article length= Long enough at around 870 words
- newness= Promoted to GA June 18th, nominated same day
- hookfact= All hooks verified
- hookinterest= I think ALT1 and ALT 3 are the most interesting. ALT1 probably more interesting to most people
- sources= All sources seem good
- npov= No concerns there
- hook length = All hooks under 200 characters
- plagiarism= Earwig brings up only direct quotes from Clayton
- QPQ = Software says 2 QPQs are required. I can't tell when the system entered backlog mode, and you've listed two reviews here, so i assume it's fine.
Approve ALTs 1 and 3 EmergentAnarchy (talk) 10:18, 24 June 2026 (UTC)
