Talk:St. John Coltrane African Orthodox Church
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
St. John Coltrane African Orthodox Church is currently a Philosophy and religion good article nominee. Nominated by Cloud atlas (talk) at 22:03, 1 July 2026 (UTC) An editor has indicated a willingness to review this article in accordance with the good article criteria and will decide whether or not to list it as a good article. Comments are welcome from any editor. When complete, this review will be closed by the reviewer. To view the review and add comments, click discuss review. |
| This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Nominator: Cloud atlas (talk · contribs) 22:03, 1 July 2026 (UTC)
GA review
- This review is transcluded from Talk:St. John Coltrane African Orthodox Church/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 2x2x2x2x2 (talk · contribs) 03:27, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
GA review
Last updated: 03:46, 9 July 2026 (UTC) by ChristieBot
See what the criteria are and what they are not
1) Well-written
1a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
- Fix error Pentacostalism to Pentecostalism in the Beliefs section
1b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
- List incorporation covers gallery, see 6b
2) Verifiable with no original research, as shown by a source spot-check
- See spot check
2a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
2b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
- confirm the sf.gov report verifies Brown's proclamation and the SFGATE piece verifies Breed's (or that both sources cover both), and adjust the citation placement if not.
2c) it contains no original research
- See if the mayoral proclamation supports both mayor's proclamations (the sentence attributes separate proclamations of two different mayors (Willie Brown and London Breed) under one citation pair, confirm each proclamation, not just the general practice)
2d) it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism
- see copyvio report. Close paraphrasing here "...for using her husband's name and likeness without permission." with this Must be fixed before GA pass
3) Broad in its coverage
3a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
- Consider adding congregation size, it's a gap in a main aspect, the church as it is now.
3b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
4) Neutral:
4) Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
5) Stable:
5) Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
- No edit war, most, if not all, revisions were made by the nominator
6) Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
6a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
- Great rationale being used
6b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions
- Add alt text to the 3 image galleries (Coltranechurch1k.jpg, Coltranechurch1.JPG, Coltranechurch8.JPG)
Overall: ![]()
Comments:
Hi i'm James and would love to review this article. Should finish by friday afternoon, pacific time. 2x2x2x2x2 (talk) 03:27, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you for taking this on! I will be ready to address your notes. Cloud atlas (talk) 03:53, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
- Please see User:2x2x2x2x2/JohnColtrane for sourcing issues. I will finish it later today 2x2x2x2x2 (talk) 14:43, 9 July 2026 (UTC)
