Talk:Steve Comisar

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Blocked from editing

Since Steve Comisar is blocked from newbie editing can an experienced editor please add podcast info into the article?

Host of Scam Junkie a true crime podcast on Spotify.

The podcast should also have its own article. Google: Scam Junkie podcast. Carlspackler75 (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

Edit request

I think the podcast should be edited into the Steve Comisar article because its reputably sourced. Scam Junkie https://www.imdb.com/title/tt29041405/?ref_=ext_shr_lnk

....and podcaster. Comisar is host of the true crime podcast Scam Junkie Scam Junkie on Spotify, Carlspackler75 (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2025 (UTC)


  • What I think should be changed (format using {{textdiff}}):
  • Why it should be changed:
  • References supporting the possible change (format using the "cite" button):

Carlspackler75 (talk) 20:52, 17 November 2025 (UTC)

References

 Not done: The podcast is already mentioned in the article. Also, IMDB is not a reliable source. Schazjmd (talk) 20:57, 17 November 2025 (UTC)
Podcast was mentioned in the article but then someone deleted it. Since the article is blocked from newbie editors can the editor who added the podcasting edit it back in the article or can another experienced editor add it back in. I wonder why it was removed. Google: Scam Junkie Podcast and you will find dozens of sources to the podcast. I'm new here but the atmosphere seems hostile and unfair. Explain why Steve Comisar can have criminal, con man, extortionist, but not actor or podcaster? The podcast is real. Why can't it have its own page? Or at least part of the Steve Comisar article? Why wouldn't the Wikipedia encyclopedia want the public to know he was a podcaster and had several acting roles? Why hide it? The article is better when it does not leave these important things out. How many con men can also say they host a popular podcast on Spotify? And also did some acting? Doesn't that make the article better. I never thought Wikipedia had individuals who decided what stayed in articles and what got removed. Carlspackler75 (talk) 20:13, 19 November 2025 (UTC)
Every thing about particular subject needs proof and it must meet source criteria on wikipedia,the podcast was linked and mentioned in career ;without valid proof., you can't add any web or links you see on google or some engines... []

Spbvj (talk) 16:27, 21 November 2025 (UTC)

Content sourced to en.kinorium.com

A lot of links to en.kinorium.com have been added recently. Kinorium does not appear to be a reliable source. It's an anonymous enthusiast site. ("Who are we? We are geeks who are determined to create the best movie website") And it allows users to change information. ("Soon all this data, as usual, will be editable by the users of the Kinorium.") Schazjmd (talk) 22:46, 26 November 2025 (UTC)

There are many other sites that list the exact same credits for this person. A lot of articles still use IMDb even though it's not reliable. And then there's these sites for example; Rotten Tomatoes, T.V. Guide, The Moviebase,Moviefone, Amazon Prime, Netflix, Hulu, AllMovie, iSpot.TV etc… The point is I just picked kinorium at random because it was pretty accurate and just used for the external filmography. Since the same credits were on five other sites, and they were all for very small acting roles, I was convinced the credits were real. I wouldn't use those sites directly in an article but I thought it was safe here. If it's strictly forbidden just tell me and I'll remove the entire section. Carlspackler75 (talk) 08:25, 28 November 2025 (UTC)
It isn't reliable and has been deleted from this per WP:BLP. - The literary leader of the age 17:48, 28 November 2025 (UTC)

Content moved from article

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI