Talk:Tiny Jesus
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:12, 19 March 2026 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Tiny Jesus figurines have appeared in cities across the world? (Source)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/LeShun Daniels Sr. and Template:Did you know nominations/Society for Crypto-Judaic Studies (2nd nomination)
- Comment:
Second DYK review coming soon!
Created by Johnson524 (talk).
Number of QPQs required: 2. DYK is currently in unreviewed backlog mode and nominator has 32 past nominations.
Johnson524 16:23, 6 March 2026 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall: 
Article is new enough and long enough (we do the same thing with ducks, drives my mom crazy). Hook fact is cited. Copyvio tool spots no issues, just some direct quotes. Image is not used here, but I'd recommend looking into using it as fair use - copyright in the US covers toys and statuettes, which these little Jesuses (Jesi?) are. Love the disambiguator. Still need one QPQ. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:57, 6 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: It's so funny you bring up "Jesi", that's what my brother calls them lol. In terms of the image, the trend is similar enough to Jeep ducking in regards to both items being made in several similar-but-different forms by several different companies. I believe if an image like File:Jeep Ducking.jpg can be kept this one should be fine, but what do you think? My second QPQ is done, but if there's anything else you want done please let me know. Cheers! Johnson524 08:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- Alright, looks good. The image is not a DYK issue, so I'm not going to worry about it right now. Looks good to go! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 10:53, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Johnson524: As DYK is currently in backlog mode and you have over 20 nominations, you still need to provide an extra QPQ: the nomination may be closed within 24 hours if you do not provide one. Narutolovehinata5 (talk · contributions) 02:44, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
- @Crisco 1492: It's so funny you bring up "Jesi", that's what my brother calls them lol. In terms of the image, the trend is similar enough to Jeep ducking in regards to both items being made in several similar-but-different forms by several different companies. I believe if an image like File:Jeep Ducking.jpg can be kept this one should be fine, but what do you think? My second QPQ is done, but if there's anything else you want done please let me know. Cheers! Johnson524 08:22, 9 March 2026 (UTC)
...somehow the order of the comments above got messed up. I hope this isn't inappropriate, but I'm placing a tick further down just so it can be seen to those uninvolved that this nom is in fact complete. Both qpqs have been in for awhile and the image was replaced with a free one after Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tiny Jesus on Hillsborough Street.jpg. Cheers! Johnson524 06:23, 17 March 2026 (UTC)A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:30, 12 March 2026 (UTC)