User talk:AirshipJungleman29

I just wanted to say I appreciate the message you left on the page of Quaerens-veritatem. They've been doing such edits like on the JFK page on tens of pages across the platform. They've been reverted numerous times and despite me explaining their misinterpretation of policy they've continued doing such edits to children in the infobox. If you could take a look at other edits they've made I would appreciate it AML KING (talk) 18:47, 13 April 2026 (UTC)

Video game mechanics are exempt because that's a technological thing; video game character art isn't exempt. (I do understand that the article says that technical restrictions forced the art choice, but that wasn't in the hook.) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 00:44, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

What next, you pull a hook about video game controls because it doesn’t explicitly relate itself to technological mechanics? Come on, leek. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 00:54, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

... no, that would be about mechanics and not character art? theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 01:06, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

And how often are character art limitations defined by something other than mechanics? ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:12, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

not often, and it's pretty interesting! if i'd seen it earlier, i would've been happy to slot in the amended hook that actually talks about it, but that wasn't proposed until a minute before midnight. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 01:20, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

You pulled it 24 minutes before midnight. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:22, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

i'm not saying it's anyone else's fault that the amended hook wasn't there in time. i hadn't read the set until then and there was a hook that facially failed DYKFICT, and so i pulled it – had I waited for a consensus, it would have rolled into the archives exactly as-is, error preserved. theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 01:25, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

There was no error, which it’s why it’s now back in the archives. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 01:38, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ i think there was an error, but i think at this point there's not much to get from hashing this out further, so, cheers :) theleekycauldron (talk • she/her) 01:52, 14 April 2026 (UTC)

About this edit:

Please see Wikipedia:Requests for comment/Example formatting#Separate votes from discussion and self-revert.

The hope is that people will read the discussion and maybe learn something about the subject before they !vote. A "shoot first and ask questions later" model is not so desirable. WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:43, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

You are free to move the discussion higher on the page; I don’t see anything at WP:RFCFORMAT about a FAQ section (of Frequently-not—yet-Asked questions?). ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 17:50, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

It's not just a FAQ section. (These are all questions that were asked and answered in the discussion leading up to the RFC.) WhatamIdoing (talk) 17:55, 15 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello AirshipJungleman29. You might want to weigh in on Proposal: Icedshakenespresso banned from the topic of Rita Hayworth and banned from interacting with TagaworShah. Regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 05:33, 19 April 2026 (UTC)

Hi AirshipJungleman29, in the open Maghreb arbitration case, which you have commented on, a proposed decision has been posted. You can review the proposed decision and draw the arbitrators' attention to any relevant material or statements. Comments may be brought to the attention of the committee on the proposed decision talk page. For a guide to the proposed decision, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Proposed decision. For the Arbitration Committee, EggRoll97 ^(talk) 04:39, 21 April 2026 (UTC)

The Core Contest has begun! You have until May 31 (23:59 UTC) to make eligible changes. Although you are most welcome (and encouraged) to continue working on the article, changes after May 31 will not be considered for rankings or prizes.

We are now about a week in, and it's worth sharing some issues we judges have noticed in the past:

• Understandability is extra important for big topics like these. Avoid jargon when possible; give context (and of course, citations), even for things that seem obvious; and always consider the age-old adage from Iridescent: "would a bright 14-year old with no prior knowledge of the topic understand this?"
• The source, the whole source, and nothing but the source. Instead of asking "what do I want to say in this article", ask yourself: "what do most high-quality, reliable and recent sources say about this topic?"
• Take a global perspective whenever possible. If you're writing about someone from France, consider looking at recent, high-quality sources in French. Amid language barriers, consider the careful use of an online translation tool or *shudder* a language dictionary.
• Plan, plan, plan! Make an outline, a draft TOC, or some kind of gameplan. Big articles are a different beast, and it's worth figuring out structural and logistical aspects early on.

Cheers from the judges, Femke, Casliber, Aza24. – Aza24 (talk) 00:08, 24 April 2026 (UTC)

If you wish to start or stop receiving news about The Core Contest, please add or remove yourself from the delivery list.

Your good article nomination of the article Iron Gate (Antioch) is under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 14:43, 26 April 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Iron Gate (Antioch) has been placed on hold, as the article needs some changes. See the review page for more information. If these are addressed within 7 days, the nomination will pass; otherwise, it may fail. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 02:22, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

Your good article nomination of the article Iron Gate (Antioch) has passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 17:42, 2 May 2026 (UTC)

On 4 May 2026, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Iron Gate (Antioch), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Iron Gate (pictured), the only surviving ancient arch dam, still does its job? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Iron Gate (Antioch). You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Iron Gate (Antioch)), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to nominate it.

Cwmhiraeth (talk) 00:02, 4 May 2026 (UTC)

		Hook update
		Your hook reached 45,740 views (1,905.8 per hour), making it one of the most viewed hooks of May 2026 – nice work!

GalliumBot (talk • contribs) (he/it) 03:28, 6 May 2026 (UTC)

I clicked thank you for moving the Hamm and Schirmacher hook pictured to prep. Too soon, it seems. This was for a 90th birthday, and is too late for that. The regular reader will not know that the whole old town of Limburg is medieval timber-framing. It can easily be shown by an example pictured (the commons have hundreds of them, but sadly not together but by street or even individual house), and if not shown should be mentioned. Simply "historic structures" is too general. Would you agree, Elias? Please try one of the options, or restore for another promoter. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 13:27, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

Sure. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 13:33, 8 May 2026 (UTC)

		The Nile River Award
		Awarded in appreciation for your helpful review of the Nile article on its road to Featured Article status. Your assistance was essential. Thanks! Noleander (talk) 15:04, 9 May 2026 (UTC)

No worries Noleander, glad to see the article promoted. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 15:16, 9 May 2026 (UTC)