Wikiwand AI

Talk:Whole hog barbecue

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Good articleWhole hog barbecue has been listed as one of the Agriculture, food and drink good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 4, 2026Good article nomineeListed
March 15, 2026Peer reviewNot reviewed
Current status: Good article
Close
More information Food and Drink task list: ...
Close

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. You can locate your hook here. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: rejected, closed by Launchballer (talk) 23:17, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

Improved to Good Article status by AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 9 past nominations.

AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 23:46, 4 March 2026 (UTC).

  • Article was promoted to GA on March 4 and is long enough at 10,190 characters. Earwig's Copyvio Detector's found no issues and the hook's claim is supported by the provided source. I think it's interesting enough and will pass this. Ruby2010 (talk) 02:20, 6 March 2026 (UTC)

This was pulled from a queue based on discussion here: Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know#Whole_hog_barbecue. Marking for closure since the nominator has been blocked for sockpuppetry, but with no prejudice against another editor adopting the nomination and reverting the closure if they so desire. Dclemens1971 (talk) 13:13, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Might adopt this; need longer to make a decision.--Launchballer 14:39, 6 April 2026 (UTC)

Peer review

Whole hog barbecue

I've listed this article for peer review because I would like to nominate it for Featured Article soon. The article has already passed GA, but I want to make sure that the flow and formatting is good, and that it's easy to understand. I've tried to make sure that the sources and reference formatting is tight, so that part shouldn't need much (if any) work.

Thanks, AllWeKnowOfHeaven (talk) 23:58, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

The nom has been blocked as a sockpuppet, so I'm going to close this. RoySmith (talk) 20:04, 15 March 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks