Wikiwand AI

Talk:Yongle Emperor

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

More information Article milestones, Date ...
Featured articleYongle Emperor is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on August 12, 2026.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 6, 2025Good article nomineeListed
May 25, 2026Good topic candidateNot promoted
June 12, 2026Featured article candidatePromoted
On this day... A fact from this article was featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on May 2, 2026.
Current status: Featured article
Close
More information Associated task forces: ...
Close

Citations

Almost all of the citations were from a book report in the Tsai book (in the Further Readings section) that I have since lost. If anyone wants to take the time to complete them, by all means. I spruced up the language a bit, but someone will have to do it...

--72.204.49.209 (talk) 06:05, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

On January 31, 2005 User:219.77.188.39 added the following comment to the article, right after ("mother unknown"):

It's totally wrong//his mother's family name was SHUO . She was a Korean girl from Korea. Zhudi(Yongle) built a temple named GANENSI () in Nanjing for her mother. Later Zhudi (Yongle) asked Korea () Dynasty to send the seven beautiful girls to be a concubine to him. He loved these Korean girls more than the girls from other tribes.

I reverted this edit, since it didn't properly fit into the article. It would be good if someone could fact-check this discussion and edit the article appropriately. --MarkSweep 22:00, 31 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Spelling Error

The phrase "sent a memorial" should be replaced with "sent a memorandom". 121.44.86.171 (talk) 06:32, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

Fixed, but new sections should be put at the bottom of the page, not the top. Dougweller (talk) 17:42, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
He wasn't right, y'know.  LlywelynII 18:40, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

Confusing Grammar Error

The article says "Yongle's economic, educational, and military reforms provided unprecedented benefits for the people, but his despotic style of government and set up spy agency." This is a sentence fragment, and it is difficult to determine what the second half of the sentence means. Remilo (talk) 02:23, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Yep

The reason I didn't put the mother is because of the long debate over the identity of his biological mother. I don't yet think there is (or ever will be) a definitive answer.

Occupation of Annam

Yongle's impact on the sinicization of Annam is overstated. The Ming could only occupy Annam for 10 years. They were defeated and chased out of Annam by Le Loi, the founder of the Le dynasty. Also, Annam refers to current northern and (part of) central Vietnam.

Reference. Viet Nam Su Luoc, vol. 1, Tran Trong Kim.


Some Korean nationalists claim that Yongle was half Korean. But their isn't any evidence for it, indeed, he was much more likely full Han Chinese.

death of Fang Xiaoru

can anybody tell me the source for the story of Fang Xiaoru writing 'usurper' in blood as he dies?

Daisy Dunn

Exploration of the world

The purpose of Zheng He's voyages was not exploration (though they have been erroneously compared to European exploration often in literature). Yongle wished to expand the Chinese tributary system and project Chinese power abroad. Zheng He did not find any places that were not already known about from China's past trade, nor were these voyages concerned with trade (in fact, trade was prohibited on these missions, though some took place regardless). Each voyage was used to show off China's military might and to threaten other states into paying tribute, which in no way covered even a portion of the costs of the missions. After Yongle's reign the voyages were abruptly stopped by the Confucian bureaucracy who had been opposed to the missions from the start due to the economic strain they put on China. I may update this article in the future with sources, but really anyone can do it. Just look at any literature on the subject published in the last ten years, or any current college world history book. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xandarg (talkcontribs) 05:54, 26 October 2007 (UTC)

Small Nitpick

There is a discrepancy on the arrival/departure of Deshin Shekpa -- it is listed as both 17th May, 1408 CE. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Missaneurysm (talkcontribs) 11:22, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Oh. ~2026-34456-26 (talk) 14:00, 14 June 2026 (UTC)


Mingshi- the English online version?

Mingshi is the official history book of the Ming dynasty. I want to read this historiography which is translated into Enlish in the Internet. I had tried to find something like this but I found nothing. Can anyone here give me the link of the English online version of Mingshi? Thanks so much,--Redflowers (talk) 09:00, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

According to my knowlegde a full translation of the Mingshi in a western language doesn't exist. The only partial translation I know of is Taylor, R(omeyn), Basic annals of Ming Tʻai-tsu, San Francisco (Chinese Materials Center) 1975. It's a translation of juan 1-3 of the Mingshi. Guss2 (talk) 11:54, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Yongle's mother

No info on her?--Pericles of AthensTalk 16:35, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

We don't really know much about her, as officially his mother is the Empress Ma, although some scholars say that his mother was a concubine. Vyselink (talk) 22:01, 13 June 2011 (UTC)

The DEFAULTSORT in the category

The DEFAULTSORT in the category should be Yongle, Emperor instead of Emperor, Yongle. It is because Yongle is the era name while Emperor is just because he is an emperor.{{editsemiprotected}}

 Done Not sure who did it or when, but the current defaultsort matches what the request above asks for. --RL0919 (talk) 20:31, 23 February 2010 (UTC)
Eh, emperor is his name [that we use] and Yongle is an adjective describing the time this particular emperor lived. The closest you could get to this in English is something like "The Elizabethan Queen" or "The Victorian Queen". So yeah, Yongle isn't his name but it's "Yongle Emperor" together, not "Emperor, Yongle". — LlywelynII 08:29, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Fate of Fang Xiao Ru's family

Well, one who ever reads of Fang cannot avoid coming across sayings that Fang's entire family within 10th vicinity are executed. However it is not universally accepted as a confirmed fact by true historians, as far as I know. There were records of his argument with Zhu Di, but the actual fulfillment of that only occurred in not very serious neither contemporary tales. According to official records of the government, Fang's family members in 2nd or 3rd vicinity (i don't remember exactly) were pardoned many years later. So the guy was killed at once of course, but what happened to his family did not seem to be exactly similar.

Yongle's diplomacy with southeast asia

appointment of governor over luzon

[commented out unhelpfully presented links above.] — LlywelynII 08:43, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

I recently demonstrated that the "Chinese governor of Luzon" is a myth originating from mistakes made by Western historians more than a century ago. The myth has been widely repeated in English-language secondary sources (including the many cited above) and has lately also been embraced and embellished in China, but this should not detract from the fact that it has no basis whatsoever in premodern Chinese sources. Please see my essay "Ko Ch'a-lao/Xu Chailao: A Mythical Ming Chinese Governor of Luzon" I recommend removing all references to a Ming Luzon governor from this article and the articles on Luzon and its history. - Shao-yun Yang 2605:A000:1117:E2EB:6DC0:EE84:32EE:B8 (talk) 01:13, 21 August 2020 (UTC)

miscellaneous

[commented out more unhelpfully presented links above.] — LlywelynII 08:41, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

other

Yereebel (talk) 06:05, 12 October 2012 (UTC)

[ditto.] — LlywelynII 08:43, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Yeah, I'm not going to delete that, but I am going to comment them out so we don't have to look at that mess. In the future, (a) pick fewer and (b) turn those URLs into links and use descriptive titles. I very much doubt anyone other than you will use any of those if it's (i) such an obscure point of his reign and (ii) so unhelpfully presented. — LlywelynII 08:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

"The Yongle Emperor", not "Yongle" or "Emperor Yongle"

I know this is hard to get in English but, with these Ming emperors, do try to remember that Chinese names during the time were very complicated; the naming taboo banned the use of the guy's personal name; the name we use is something similar to "The Elizabethan Queen" or "The Clintonian President" you just don't say things like "Queen Elizabethan enjoyed executing relatives" or "Clintonian enjoyed french fries".

You can use the temple names that way "Chengzu ordered the execution of everyone who had even heard of the village and burned all records of its existence" even though it's a little morbid to do so; but "Yongle" should be written as "The Yongle Emperor" every time and not "Yongle" or "Emperor Yongle". At the same time, you don't have to say "during the reign of Yongle": since it is the name of the era, it's correct to say "During the Yongle reign..." or "Throughout the Yongle era..."

That's nitpicky, but since people who don't know much about this whole thing come through and use these articles to learn about the culture, we should do what we can to keep it correct. — LlywelynII 08:40, 13 October 2012 (UTC)

Makes sense. ~2026-34456-26 (talk) 13:59, 14 June 2026 (UTC)

Military accomplishments section

The part about the Mongols seems to need some work. On one hand, it seems a bit strange to state that the Mongol princes needed to be compelled to enter the Ming tribute system. After all, a few decades later the Tumu Crisis was caused by the Mongols not being allowed to "pay" as much "tribute" as they would habe liked to.

Also the conclusion seems somewhat non-standard. My impression from skimming over the Cambridge History of China was that Yongle's campaigns did not really achieve all that much. This also seems quite consistent with the fact that they had to be repeated again and again. Yaan (talk) 18:18, 20 December 2012 (UTC)

Diplomatic and military conduct

Minorities

Questionable sources

Assessment comment

Edit Request

GA review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


This review is transcluded from Talk:Yongle Emperor/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Min968 (talk · contribs) 17:57, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Reviewer: Векочел (talk · contribs) 06:52, 24 June 2025 (UTC)


GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check.
    a (reference section): b (inline citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars, etc.:
  6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:

I will review this shortly. Векочел (talk) 06:52, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Commentary

  • "After Su's death in 1385, Fu Youde, Xu's deputy, took over leadership." Do you mean Xu Da rather than Su?
    • Done.
  • "Zhu Di attempted to present himself as the Hongwu Emperor's legitimate successor by declaring himself and the Hongwu Emperor's fifth son, Zhu Su, as the only sons of Empress Ma in the 1403 edition of the official Veritable Records of Emperor Taizu." Can you briefly explain this decision in terms of the Ming succession law?
    • A note has been added.
  • "Zhu Di did not have a good relationship with Lan Yu, and according to historian Wang Shizhen (王世貞; 1526–1590), he was responsible for Lan's execution in March 1393." Does the source Tsai (2002), pp. 50–52, explain Zhu Di's involvement in the Lan Yu execution?
    • Earlier in 1388, after suppressing the Uriyangqad Mongols in Manchuria, Lan Yu presented several rare steeds to the Prince of Yan, but the prince deftly turned him down by saying, “The booty horses have not yet been presented to the emperor. If I receive them first, how can I claim that I respect my lord and my father?” Lan Yu later penetrated into northern Mongolia without disaster, and that won him a dukedom but also led him to become increasingly arrogant and flippant in his conduct. As the Prince of Yan mused about the inevitable power struggle, Lan Yu suddenly became his biggest obstacle. It is very likely that it was upon the recommendation of the Prince of Yan that Emperor Hongwu sicced his spies on such veteran generals as Lan Yu, Feng Sheng, and Fu Youde. According to Wang Shizhen (1526–90), a prominent Ming scholar and a doctoral degree holder of 1547, the Prince of Yan was chiefly responsible for the execution of Lan Yu, on charge of treason, on March 22, 1393. Tsai (2002), pp. 51–52
  • "During the clashes, the palace was set on fire, resulting in the deaths of the emperor, his empress, and his son." Does the source Chan (1988), p. 201 state as a definitive fact the Jianwen Emperor died in the fire?
    • During the melee that followed the arrival of the prince's armies, theimperial palace compound inside the Nanking city walls was set ablaze.When the fire subsided, several badly burned bodies were produced anddeclared to be those of the emperor, his wife empress Ma (married in1395), and his eldest son Chu Wen-k'uei (b. 1396). Chan (1988), p. 201
  • "As a result, the atomization of administration that was characteristic of the Hongwu Emperor's rule diminished, allowing the emperor to focus less on routine details." Please clarify by giving a brief comparison of the Hongwu style of administration with Yongle's form of governance.
    • A note has been added.
  • "The emperor restored the titles of the princes of Zhou, Qi, and Min, which had been abolished by the Jianwen Emperor, but these titles did not come with the same power and authority as before." Does the source go into the specific powers these three princes had held under the previous reigns?
    • It is obvious that in order to begin with a clean slate and to concentrate all power in his own hands, the new emperor wanted to wipe out the old princely guard units one by one. He realized that he needed to first eliminate the most politically volatile elements by transferring many of the northern princedoms to central and south China. As a result, the Prince of Gu (Zhu Hui) was transferred from Xuanfu to Changsha, the Prince of Ning (Zhu Quan) from Daning to Nanchang, and so on. For a while he allowed the Prince of Dai (Zhu Gui) to stay at Datong, the Prince of Liao (Zhu Zhi) at Liaodong, and the Prince of Shu (Zhu Chun, 1371-1423) at Chengdu, but later on Yongle took away their troop commands altogether. And in spite of the fact that he restored the titles and properties to the Prince of Zhou (Zhu Su), the Prince of Qi (Zhu Fu), and the Prince of Min (Zhu Bian), they became essentially ornamental symbols with ceremonial functions as Yongle brought the princely establishments firmly under his personal control. Tsai (2002), p. 76
  • "During the latter half of his reign, the Yongle Emperor accused many of these princes of committing crimes and punished them by removing their personal guards." Can you give an example?
    • The emperor's desire to eliminate the princely guards is readily understandable: under the enfeoffment system set up during the Hung-wu reign, the imperial princes had had far-reaching power. The Yung-lo emperor had used this power to build up his own armies, and that experience led him to disband the princely guards and to remove his own sons from military commands. Both his eldest son and his second son had taken part in campaigns during the civil war. However, after he ascended the throne, he made his eldest son regent while he was away on military campaigns; his second son was arrested in 1417 for scheming against his elder brother. At the same time, just as the Chien-wen emperor had done, the Yung-lo emperor also felt compelled to cut back the power of the remaining imperial princes, who were his own brothers; many were purged on criminal charges and their guard units disbanded. Therefore, by the end of his reign, only four of the original thirty princely guard units created by the Hung-wu emperor survived intact. Chan (1988), p. 245
  • "Grand Secretary Xie Jin disagreed and argued that Zhu Gaochi would win the hearts of the people with his humanity." Does the source also mention any arguments based on Zhu Gaochi being the eldest son?
    • But before making his critical decision, Yongle secretly sought Xie Jin’s advice. Xie said, “Your eldest son is noted for both his humanity and filial piety and has won the heart of the whole world.” While Yongle remained silent, Xie added, “Moreover, you have a splendid grandson to succeed your eldest son.” Xie was referring to Gaozhi’s six-year-old son, Zhu Zhanji, the future fifth Ming Emperor Xuande (r. 1426–35), who was Yongle’s favorite grandson. Yongle finally nodded his head and the difficult decision was made. Tsai (2002), p. 98
  • "One significant and permanent step taken during this time was the relocation of a large portion of the army to the Beijing area. As the capital moved to Beijing, the majority of the 41 guard units of the Nanjing garrison also made the move." How many soldiers were in a guard unit?
    • A note has been added.
  • The paragraph beginning with "At the beginning of the Yongle Emperor's reign, the defense system on the northern border was reorganized", this paragraph proceeds as though the Great Wall had been established but mid-way reads that "the Great Wall had not yet been built." Could you clarify when building on the Great Wall began and was completed?
    • The secondline was closer to Beijing along the Great Wall line (although the Wallhad not yet been built) and was mostly for defensive purpose. Wang (2011), p. 116
  • "In an effort to incorporate countries from around the world into the tributary system of subordination to the Ming dynasty, the emperor utilized a combination of military force, diplomatic contacts, trade exchange, and the spread of Chinese culture." It would be helpful to provide a few sentences explaining how the Chinese tributary system functioned.
    • A note has been added.
  • "In Tibet, the Hongwu Emperor did not establish contacts with the kings of the Phagmodrupa dynasty, but instead with the Karmapa, who ruled southeastern Tibet (Kham), which was adjacent to China." Does the source give any indication of why the Hongwu Emperor did not try to establish a relationship with the Phagmodrupa kings? Was Hongwu a devoted Buddhist?
    • At the time the Ming came to power, religious rivalries between the monastic orders in Tibet frequently led to open warfare; there was a deep split between religious and political authority. It is by no means clear how much of this was understood in Nanking. The first emperor is said to have been anxious to prevent a recurrence of the sort of trouble with the Tibetans that had happened in T'ang times. He did not, however, establish contacts with the Phag-mo-gru-pa kings, but with the Karma-pa abbots who controlled much of the nearer Kham region and southeastern Tibet. The emperor sent an envoy asking the former holders of office under the Yuan to come to Nanking for reinvestiture, and the first mission arrived in the winter of 1372—73. The head of the order at that time was the fourth Black Hat reincarnation of Rol-pa'i-rdo-rje (1340-83), who had been at the Yuan court from 1359 to 1363. He himself never accepted the emperor's invitation to Nanking, but he sent envoys until shortly before his death. Chan (1988), p. 262
  • "Ming officials saw the high cost of equipping the fleet as a way for the eunuchs to gain disproportionate power." Can you write a few sentences about the conflict between officials and eunuchs at the Ming court?

Векочел (talk) 16:18, 5 July 2025 (UTC)

Min968, I am satisfied with your work on this article and will pass it. Векочел (talk) 21:32, 6 July 2025 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Classing

Pronunciation

Today's featured article

Recent reverts

Related Articles

Timelines

Top Qs

Fact Checks