User:Goodtiming8871

Dear Wikipedians,
Thank you for your diligent work for Wikipedia by sharing valuable information for safer and friendly global community. I believe that Wikipedia would be one of the most significant sources of information for our human society. I've attended the Wikipedia meet up at Brisbane during the year 2015-2017. It was a perfect time for me to see WikiGnomes and VIPs assisting many people in the world by Wikipedia. I love the positive mindset Wikipedian as they help a global society. A free encyclopaedia - it is an excellent idea for everyone. I fancy aboriginal art and American and UK pop music

Please refer to that I have a secondary account User:Goodtiming1788 as per the reasons below 1) Using the secondary account: Goodtiming1788 when I need to utilise the public computer. 2) A security purpose - password recovery if my primary account is hacked and unable to login to my central account User: Goodtiming8871 3) Please contact me via talk page if I should be aware of any policy for the backup account usage.

link to Reliable_sources: [] > list []

Creating_an_RfC []

Courtesy pings to those who participated in previous discussions

• @User1, User2, and ...:

• Wikipedia:Administrators[]

User:Goodtiming8871/sandbox

• Wikipedia:Requests for page protection []

• WP:UNDUE The need to give appropriate weight to the trivial and the important,

example: Neutrality in Wikipedia articles requires that all significant viewpoints published by reliable sources be represented proportionally to their prominence. This means that majority views should be given more weight than minority views - balance. For example, the Earth article doesn't mention the flat Earth theory because it's a very minor viewpoint.

• WP:Synthesis of published material

• Community_portal: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Community_portal

- regarding fake_news: []

• The summary of editing tools Using the ref name: the short form: ^[1] original form: ^[1]

• Please avoid adding citations in the leading section per Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Lead section, there are sources in the body available for this.

• Citation_bot/use: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Citation_bot/use

• Three Main idea: neutral point of view, Wikipedia:Ownership of content, Wikipedia:Civility = respect and civility
• Wikipedia:CheckUser, Oversight[], Wikipedia:CheckUser, Check user policy[], Ombudsman commission[], Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Audit

Guidelines or Useful pages

• Wikipedia:Requests for page protection
• undue, biased
• prevention of editorialization.
• Wikipedia:Wikipedia in brief - Wikipedia:What Wikipedia is not WP:NPOV
• Wikipedia:Policies and guidelines - Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard WP:DRN[]
• Wikipedia:Notability
• Reliable_sources []
• Wikipedia:NOR-Wikipedia:No original research: All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not clearly stated by the sources themselves.

This page in a nutshell: Wikipedia does not publish original thought. All material in Wikipedia must be attributable to a reliable, published source. WK-Articles may not contain any new analysis or synthesis of published material that serves to reach or imply a conclusion not clearly stated by the sources themselves.

• WP:SYNTHESIS which is original research performed by an editor here.[i] "A and B, therefore C" is acceptable only if a reliable source has published the same argument in relation to the topic of the article.
• Wikipedia:NOR "No original research" (NOR) is one of three core content policies that, along with Neutral point of view and Verifiability, determines the type and quality of material acceptable in articles. Because these policies work in harmony, they should not be interpreted in isolation from one another, and editors should familiarize themselves with all three. For questions about whether any particular edit constitutes original research, see the NOR noticeboard.

Topics

• https://vote.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:SecurePoll/vote/1638
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:VisualEditor
• Open Source Icons: to create the open-source image ^{[2] [3]}
• Acceptance and commitment therapy
• Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy ‎
• Cognitive behavioral therapy ‎
• Korean conflict
• 2017 North Korea crisis
• Korean reunification
• Foreign relations of North Korea
• Index of Korea-related articles
• 2002 State of the Union Address
• Foreign relations of North Korea
• Index of Korea-related articles
• Mobile phone radiation and health
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microwave#Effects_on_health

• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comfort_women
• North Korea–Pakistan relations
• North Korea–United States relations
• Nuclear power in North Korea
• Sohae Satellite Launching Station
• List of nuclear weapons tests of North Korea
• User's Subpage - Draft version as per the wikipedia guide
• Wiki projects ^{[4] [5]}
• Central serous retinopathy
• 2018 Korean peace process
• Peace Treaty on Korean Peninsula
• 2019 North Korea–United States summit
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:List_of_policies
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:There_is_no_deadline
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arguments_to_avoid_in_deletion_discussions#Crystal_ball
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Notability
• https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Review_tests

History of DMZ

Hello, Please refer to one of the latest videos link below about History of Korean Demilitarized Zone. I think it is quite a good summary of just 7 minutes 8 seconds from over 70 years of several events.
As you may have understood, because of this DMZ (Power game of the Soviet Union and U.S.) and Korean War; about 3 million people were terribly killed or awfully wounded !!!.
If your close family members were killed during the Korean War and you yearn for them, the meaning of the DMZ could have been totally different from any other people.
You would also be eager to finish the Korean War 1953 as you have felt the horrible situation of war. -- Woefully, North and South Korea are still technically at war for about 70 years and endorsement from U.S. Government would be about 99% major factor for finishing the painful and long-lasting Korean war.

• North and South Korea Has The Deadliest Border In the World: Link: ^[6]

• Free public bus and boat:
• City Hopper(Free) ^[7]
• City glider(Free) ^[8]
• City cat (paid service )
• QML Pathology
• Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology
• QSCAN
• Exact radiology
• CitiScan Radiology
• I-MED Radiology
• Moving the goalposts
• 2018–19 Korean peace process
• Gold-collecting campaign in South Korea
• Peace_Treaty_on_Korean_Peninsula
• United States Forces Korea
• First US-DPRK summit
• Second US-DPRK summit
• First DMZ meeting of U.S.-South Korea-North Korea
• Category:Think tanks based in South Korea
• Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action
• Iran nuclear deal framework

The created pages

House of Peace
House of Freedom
the first inter-Korean summit
the second inter-Korean summit
the forth inter-Korean summit
Zetron
Suh Hoon
David C. Kang
2007 North–South Summit Declaration
Joint Declaration of the Denuclearization of the Korean Peninsula 1992
July 4th North–South Korea Joint Statement 1972