User talk:203N7HN6

Hello, I'm ยูอีวีเอการเรียนรู้. An edit that you recently made to X-ray binary seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! ยูอีวีเอการเรียนรู้ (talk) 08:38, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

i dont see a provlem as articles such as Red giants are capitalized regardless of where they are

but then again, im new to wikipedia so thanks for correcting me :D 203N7HN6 (talk) 09:09, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

also i really think hyperlinks look ugly without capitalization so maybe its just my copium 203N7HN6 (talk) 09:11, 14 October 2025 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to Switch did not have an edit summary. Collaboration among editors is fundamental to Wikipedia, and every edit should be explained by a clear edit summary, or by discussion on the talk page. Please use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit or to describe what it changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

or in the visual editor:

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. When logged in to your Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary (or the default undo summary), and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Constant314 (talk) 09:42, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

will do, thanks 203N7HN6 (talk) 09:47, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. Please slow down. You have made a large number of reverts and placing of warnings on user talk pages. While some of these look OK, others are verging on violations of politeness, WP:5P4, and also not constructive building of Wikipedia, WP:NOTHERE. I notice that you also often do not include edit summaries. Please be aware that not including an edit summary can be considered to be disruptive editing if it is a habit. Ldm1954 (talk) 10:13, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

actually i have been making edit summaries but i do admit they are a bit vague.. such as "citation"/"citations"/"removed dupe links" so i admit thats my fault

also ill try to slow down on the warnings and try to give my reverts a summary (i never really acknowledged that i needed a summary for my reverts considering the fact theres an automated summary)

have a good day! 203N7HN6 (talk) 10:18, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello. Please consider reverting your restoration of the material to this page. If you look at the talk page you will see there has been a long-time problem with this article. It looks very much like Buchanan himself is editing it like a resume to puff up his achievements. Practically all the sources are primary sources, and the writing reads and promotional and is not encylopedic. Note how there's an inappropriate reference in the lede to a directory page, and how later in the article one of the references is to a Onedrive file. Thank you ~2026-10466-10 (talk) 21:40, 16 February 2026 (UTC)

i see, alright thanks! i actually didnt check the citations so thats on me. Have a nice day! 203N7HN6 (talk) 05:24, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, 203N7HN6! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

If you have questions, just use this link to ask for help; a volunteer will visit you here shortly!

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:21, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

I'd like to thank you especially for your anti-vandalism efforts. Keep up the good work! Chess enjoyer (talk) 06:23, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

thanks so much! 203N7HN6 (talk) 06:23, 17 February 2026 (UTC)

You have been minnowed for: Hello! thank you for your anti-vandalism work and such, just know we usually don't welcome users before they edit, and only if those edits are in good faith =) – LuniZunie_(talk) 06:11, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

dumb me, thats why the welcome message always mentions their contributions..haha..sorry im still adapting to wikipedia 203N7HN6 (talk) 06:13, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

@203N7HN6 Nono it's all good! I've made the same mistake before, and some of the Wikipedia languages actually have a bot do this. I do seriously appreciate the work you are putting in =) – LuniZunie_(talk) 06:14, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your work, and, more importantly, thank you for how you respond to people. It tells a lot about who you are (in a good way!).

– LuniZunie_(talk) 06:16, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Also, just so you know, this guy was an LTA sockpuppet and has been globally locked. – LuniZunie_(talk) 06:19, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

Also, just so you know, this guy was an LTA and has been globally locked.

wow, good to know! the guy wasnt really trying to hide the fact that he wasnt here to build an enyclopedia so it didnt take much to get onto his intentions.. 203N7HN6 (talk) 06:21, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

thanks so much! i try my best in reverting possible vandalisms/disruptive editings and learn from my (occasional) mistakes!

also cute kitty :) 203N7HN6 (talk) 06:19, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

not vandalism. There's strong academic sources that point to all this anti-asbestos nonsense just being mass "climate" histeria. NPOV ~2026-34704-5 (talk) 05:34, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

sources such as..? 203N7HN6 (talk) 05:37, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi 203N7HN6! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 06:00, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

youre a shithead ~2026-11205-69 (talk) 06:42, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

thats nice. Maybe wikipedia isnt for you, and thats fine. But please, dont resort to vandalism. Have a good day! :) 203N7HN6 (talk) 06:44, 20 February 2026 (UTC)

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

More information Views/Day, Quality ...

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
1,362		Super Bowl VI (talk)	Add sources
526		Fluorescent lamp (talk)	Add sources
92		Virtual power plant (talk)	Add sources
255		Personal life of Leonardo da Vinci (talk)	Add sources
786		Lithium iron phosphate battery (talk)	Add sources
118		Compressed-air energy storage (talk)	Add sources
30		Compressed-air vehicle (talk)	Cleanup
20		Vehicle classification by propulsion system (talk)	Cleanup
42		Electric vehicle conversion (talk)	Cleanup
24		Alternative approaches to redefining the kilogram (talk)	Expand
219		Mendocino County, California (talk)	Expand
211		Charging station (talk)	Expand
43		Industrial sociology (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
58		Japanese pop culture in the United States (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
29		Arterial roads in metropolitan Phoenix (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
241		Jury trial (talk)	Merge
422		Paratha (talk)	Merge
127		Nördlinger Ries (talk)	Merge
78		Luminous paint (talk)	Wikify
310		AES Corporation (talk)	Wikify
58		Juries in England and Wales (talk)	Wikify
2		Talat Gasimov (talk)	Orphan
7		Abdulaziz bin Khalifa al-Attiyah (talk)	Orphan
3		Ramiz Novruz (talk)	Orphan
4		Babura, Bhojpur (talk)	Stub
35		Glenn Medeiros (1987 album) (talk)	Stub
27		Majestic Star II (talk)	Stub
8		Brudevælte Lurs (talk)	Stub
26		The Artificial Silk Girl (talk)	Stub
9		Alberto Fernández (cyclist) (talk)	Stub

Close

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 10:06, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

A bunch of edits twiddling markup whitespace around in ways that change the style from one entirely acceptable variant to another (less common) variant while not affecting the rendered output of the page are not helpful. See WP:STYLERET, WP:COSMETICBOT. Other unhelpful changes include adding (entirely unnecessary and arguably ugly and distracting) quotation marks around the parameters in HTML tags, changing the capitalization of template names, and changing widely used template shortcut names to longer versions. Additionally, if you are going to be a WP:MEATBOT, please file for a Bot approval request. –jacobolus (t) 07:54, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

ahh i see. Ok my apologies. Have a nice day! 203N7HN6 (talk) 08:42, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

is User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/autoCleanup - Wikipedia fine? 203N7HN6 (talk) 08:49, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I'm not super familiar with any of these scripts, but if that's what you're currently using, then I'd recommend against it. –jacobolus (t) 09:04, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

actually i use two: User:Qwerfjkl/scripts/autoCleanup.js + User:Eejit43/scripts/article-cleaner.js but if either counts as meatbotting then i might aswell stop :/ 203N7HN6 (talk) 09:07, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

I'd recommend checking carefully what the scripts are doing. Changes like turning ==Heading== into == Heading == or vice versa, changing <ref name=foo> into <ref name="foo"> or vice versa, or changing {{template |param=value}} into {{template | param = value}} or vice versa are not really helpful to do in an automated fashion across many articles. Either version renders the same, editor preference varies, these edits add noise to watchlists, and sometimes they spark edit warring. On the other hand, if you want to run this script on the few articles you are actively (re)writing, then typically nobody cares.

Some of the other kinds of changes are uncontroversial, but I think there are already bots or other script-assisted editors coming through (eventually) to make most of those changes. –jacobolus (t) 16:04, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Just a word about watchlist noise. I watch about 1000 articles, others watch more. Mainly I do this to keep them from degrading. There is obvious vandalism which is not so bad because it is obvious. There is a bot that does a good job catching it. There are well intentioned edits that never the less are not improvements. Those take time to review. And then there is sneaky vandalism, say, changing a single plus sign to a negative sign. Maybe a genuine error was being corrected. Those take a lot of time. But even experience editors make mistakes. So, every edit you make takes some of my attention. Edits that don't change the rendered display are annoying. They are OK if you are also making a meaningful edit. Constant314 (talk) 18:33, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

sorry about that 203N7HN6 (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

it would be fine if i used these scripts in my edits, as long as i make actual edits to the page right? 203N7HN6 (talk) 05:20, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

It depends. For example, it is a stylistic choice of some editors to put a double space at the end of a sentence. It makes no difference to the rendering, but it makes it easier to pick out the sentences when you look at the source. So, changing all the double spaces to single spaces would be changing the style of the article without a consensus. Constant314 (talk) 05:30, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

aahhh i see, thanks! 203N7HN6 (talk) 05:31, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

What I mean is: if you pick a few articles with serious defects and you spend hours researching and writing big sections of them, and you also incidentally change the markup formatting on those pages to match your preferred style, it's unlikely people will complain (or if another major contributor disagrees you can hash out the dispute on the local talk page); the benefit of your work will be clear, and most people don't care that strongly about these trivial markup variants.

If instead you make a pile of relatively trivial edits to dozens or hundreds of different articles, none of which you are really putting major work into, and your edits also include a bunch of gratuitous markup formatting changes, then a bunch of the people watching those pages will be mildly annoyed.... so generally don't do that. –jacobolus (t) 06:02, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

alright thanks for telling me! :) 203N7HN6 (talk) 06:03, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

In [this edit] you changed the spelling of many works to a British English variant. As established in WP:RETAIN we ask for consensus before such changes. If you believe the spellings should be changed, start with a Talk page discussion please.

In addition, bundling many unrelated types of edits into one go is very inconvenient to other editors. Change the spacing in one edit and spelling in another. I repaired the spelling problems but it was annoying. Johnjbarton (talk) 17:00, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

my apologies will do :] 203N7HN6 (talk) 05:18, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

im cxonfused, isnt the entire article written in british english thoguh? 203N7HN6 (talk) 06:41, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

It looks like [this edit] established American English. Constant314 (talk) 04:43, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

ah ok 203N7HN6 (talk) 05:30, 28 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. You appear to be using some kind of automated tool to fix "typos" in person names and in place names.

A large number of these changes appear to be incorrect.

Strongly recommend you self revert all of these changes. And stop making them in this manner. Or, at the very least, double check that your change is correct and an improvement (relative to sources) before applying semi-automated changes.

For example in:

• this edit you changed "Ballyheedy" to "Ballyseedy". This is not a correction/improvement to spelling. This is a disimprovement which introduced a clear factual error. Where you conflated/confused two completely different places. The R589 does not run >100km NW from Bandon in Cork to Ballyseedy in Kerry. It is a short regional road which runs <17km East from Bandon to Ballyheedy (near Halfway). See: S.I. No. 54/2012 - Roads Act 1993 (Classification of Regional Roads) Order 2012. Or any map.
• this edit you changed "Ballyhaura" to "Ballyhoura". This is not a correction/improvement to spelling. This is a disimprovement (where you have introduced a clear factual error). And conflated/confused two completely different places. "Ballyhaura" is correctly reflected as the former name of Ballyhea. Which is what the source (which supports that text) clearly states. Ballyhoura may be the name of a nearby mountain/range. But that isn't the former name of the village.
• this edit you have conflated Ballyfin in County Laois with Ballylin House the former (now demolished) home of the King family in Ferbane, County Offaly
• this edit you appear to have conflated the name of a fictional Italian film character (surnamed "Balmora") with a royal residence in the UK. Or some other unrelated topic.
• this edit you randomly changed one instance of the name of a member of the IUGG. From "Georges Balmino" to "Georges Balbino". Despite the fact that his name is correctly spelled elsewhere in the same article. And, presumably, he has himself spelled correctly on his own CV on the IUGG website.
• this edit you randomly changed the name of a branded drug/medical product "Balmex" to "Balmer". For no explained reason. And where the body of the article (and the sources) clearly states that "the [Block Drug] company's products are Polident denture cleansers, Sensodyne toothpaste, Beano dietary supplements and Balmex diaper-rash ointments".
• this edit you indiscriminately changed one random instance of a candidate's name - from "Romeo Balmeo" to "Romeo Baldeo". Despite the fact that the rest of the body (and the sources) give "BALMEO ROMEO (IND)".
• this edit you incorrectly changed the name of a stone circle from "Little Balmae" to "Little Balhae". Despite the fact that multiple authoritative sources (including those linked in the article) clearly give "Little Balmae".
• (And don't get me started on the multiple random errors you introduced into the list articles covering townlands in Ireland. Conflating the name of a townland with the name/names of places which are elsewhere.)

Long story short: You appear to be introducing lots of factual errors at a high rate of speed. And you need to stop. And, ideally, review every semi-automated edit you made recently. And, if you're not 100% sure that it was accurate and reflective of the sources, you'd ideally self-revert. Guliolopez (talk) 11:12, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

that was actually a sincere mistake that i knew i was gonna get called out for. I accidentally was clicking "replace" instead of skip and realized that too far in and thats probably why im never using typo again.... 203N7HN6 (talk) 12:03, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Whack!

You've been whacked with a wet trout.

Don't take this too seriously. Someone just wants to let you know that you did something silly.

You have been trouted for: Making random/indiscriminate changes (which introduced factual errors) - and doing so at a high rate of speed. As above. Guliolopez (talk) 11:28, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

really sorry 203N7HN6 (talk) 12:05, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

An apology is grand. (Although not due to me - rather the community as a whole.) But what would really be useful is if you review all your recent changes. And, if you're not confident that each change was correct/accurate, maybe self-revert. I've reviewed/reverted some. But not all. If these are all known/acknowledged mistakes (or likely ones), then please own and correct them. Thanks. Guliolopez (talk) 12:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

the ones made in the same minute (9:10) were the mistakes, others i can give you my word that i did a short verification for each of them (unless u can prove otherwise) if tou did revert my mistakes, thanks! :) 203N7HN6 (talk) 12:30, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. RE:

• "the ones made in the same minute (9:10) were the mistakes". You made >60 changes using the "typos" tool. Not just the >20 made (within one minute of each other) at 9:10. I have reverted ~30 of these as clearly invalid. You should really review the rest.
• "i did a short verification for each". Did you do verification of before making this change? Reverted by Warofdreams for being inconsistent with the sources? Or check the name of the insurance company before making this change? Reverted by me because the source which immediately follows it clearly supports what was already there? What verification did you do before this change? When multiple sources and discographies indicate that the previous spelling was likely correct?

If you don't think that you have a responsibility for reviewing and correcting a series of edits (which you've already acknowledged contained a high number of edits which were almost certainly incorrect), then that's something of a concern. It is not other editor's responsibility to review all your edits for potential issues. And to correct them. Take some responsibility for your own likely incorrect edits please. Or at the very least re-review them. Guliolopez (talk) 14:07, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marafa Bashir Abba, a link pointing to the disambiguation page Administration was added. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 11:55, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

hello labubu (talk2me) 07:00, 26 February 2026 (UTC)