User talk:50.100.61.251

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.


If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:14, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bikini Bottom (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by AlphaBetaGamma were:
This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article on the same subject. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, 50.100.61.251! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 01:09, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mickey Cuts Up (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NFILM, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. Needs additional sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:37, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bowser Jr. (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:GNG requires significant coverage (about the character, not mentions in passing) in multiple independent reliable secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 03:51, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mickey Cuts Up (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:
This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Still fails WP:NFILM - none of the cited references even mention a 1931 short film, Mickey Cuts Up.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 04:38, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Odie (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:GNG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 06:08, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bikini Bottom (December 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Grahaml35 was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at SpongeBob SquarePants. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Grahaml35 (talk) 15:28, 3 December 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mickey Cuts Up (January 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ca was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of films). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
I spent at least 30 minutes trying to access the paywalled sources and found that none of the citations actually back up the claims made in the article.

The Reference Reviews article is a review of the book Disney Voice Actors: A Biographical Dictionary, and has no mention of the film Mickey Cuts Up. So using Google Books, I searched the actual book itself, only to discover that it only lists the voice actors without any commentary, true to its title.

I did not have access to the full-text of Hollywood Cartoons: American Animation in its Golden Age, but a search bar shows that there is no mention of "mickey cuts up" or "mickey mouse".

I could not get access to The animated film encyclopedia: a complete guide to American shorts, features, and sequences, 1900-1979, I recommend adding a quote from the book using the quote= parameter in the citation template to make it easy to verify.

Shadow of a Mouse only touches on the film briefly, and does not verify the full date. Mickey Cuts Up (Burt Gillett/ Disney, November 1931) embeds its spatial gag within the performance space. Pluto is dragging Mickey and his lawn mower west. As the “cam- era” “pans” left, we approach a bench. Its receding orthogonal lines change with each frame as though it were a solid object (Figure 44). The effect is quite jarring, especially because a tree on a top cel is not simi- larly foreshortened. The two-dimensionality of the figures, which have no roundness or depth and cast no shadows, contrasts markedly with this three-dimensional invasion in their world.

Music in Disney's Animated Features only discusses the music, true to its title, and has no information on its reception.

Have you read the sources before citing?
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Ca talk to me! 14:37, 6 January 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Duck Hunt (March 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was:
The proposed article does not have sufficient content to require an article of its own, but it could be merged into the existing article at Mickey Mouse (film series)#The Duck Hunt. Since anyone can edit Wikipedia, you are welcome to add that information yourself. Thank you.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 10:13, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Crockett-Doodle-Do has been accepted

Crockett-Doodle-Do, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

BD2412 T 21:36, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Odie

Information icon Hello, 50.100.61.251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Odie, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:07, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bikini Bottom

Information icon Hello, 50.100.61.251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bikini Bottom, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:09, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Bowser Jr.

Information icon Hello, 50.100.61.251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Bowser Jr., a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Bowser Jr.

Hello, 50.100.61.251. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Bowser Jr.".

Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission, and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 04:25, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Odie

Hello, 50.100.61.251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Odie".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 06:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Mickey Cuts Up

Information icon Hello, 50.100.61.251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Mickey Cuts Up, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 21:07, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Mickey Cuts Up

Hello, 50.100.61.251. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Mickey Cuts Up".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:03, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:The Duck Hunt

Information icon Hello, 50.100.61.251. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:The Duck Hunt, a page you created, has not been edited in at least five months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:09, 19 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI