User talk:Absurdum4242
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
4th Galician Uhlans
I disagree with your reasons for declining the article. Currently, it already has three academic sources: Thomas Mocharitsh's diploma thesis on Ruthenian military terminology, Evan Samborowski's paper on Galician military units, and Alexei Lithavorik's Russian language research on Austro-Hungarian units on the Eastern Front. I can't find many in-depth sources online, even in German, but my plan was to add more to the article when they became available
Top AfC Editor
| The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2025 Top Editor | ||
| In 2025 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:20, 21 January 2026 (UTC) |
Thank you for reviewing "Digital City Kyoto"
Hi,
thank you for reviewing and accepting my submission, Digital City Kyoto. I am very happy to see it live on Wikipedia.
I noticed on your user page that you have a deep connection with Japan. It was a great pleasure for me that someone with an understanding of Japanese context handled this review.
By the way, I actually traveled around New Zealand last year and had a wonderful time there. It feels like a nice coincidence to have my article reviewed by someone based in such a beautiful country!
Best regards
Toru Nomad717 (talk) 16:21, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- No problem at all, with the Doi links making it super easy to check sources, it clearly passed notability standards. Thanks for doing such a good job of it. It would be great to see you try to write some more articles - we are always short of new Japanese content, and it’s super tricky getting stuff through as not enough reviewers can read Japanese or are prepared to use the translation software.
- Glad you enjoyed NZ too 😊 Absurdum4242 (talk) 16:24, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
Review Request
Hello, I want to know if you can review my article Draft:Eliot K-8 Innovation School, I have finalized it with citations. Welovecontributorss [talk] 05:43, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- Hi there, @Welovecontributorss - I reviewed your article. Unfortunately it was still a decline at this stage, but hopefully my comment will help you see what still needs done to give you the best chance of an acceptance in the future. Have a great day 👍 Absurdum4242 (talk) 06:39, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- I do agree, it does sound like an ad. Thanks for the feedback. I'll fix it as soon as possible. Welovecontributorss [talk] 07:08, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- one small question- would https://northend.page/search/node?keys=eliot+school be a good source? Welovecontributorss [talk] 10:25, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
- @Welovecontributorss It’s honestly 50/50, and I would tend towards not counting it. It’s not a blog per se, but the about says it’s a volunteer group, but we don’t have names on the bylines, and don’t have any idea if they have an editorial policy, which are two things we usually look for. I also noticed a couple of articles bylined “AI created”, which makes me even less convinced. Weirdly, if they had just signed their name to articles, or if it was like a physical supermarket rag newspaper, it would probably count, but as is… Absurdum4242 (talk) 12:51, 24 February 2026 (UTC)