User talk:Absurdum4242

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


4th Galician Uhlans

I disagree with your reasons for declining the article. Currently, it already has three academic sources: Thomas Mocharitsh's diploma thesis on Ruthenian military terminology, Evan Samborowski's paper on Galician military units, and Alexei Lithavorik's Russian language research on Austro-Hungarian units on the Eastern Front. I can't find many in-depth sources online, even in German, but my plan was to add more to the article when they became available

Top AfC Editor

The Articles for Creation Barnstar 2025 Top Editor
In 2025 you were one of the top AfC editors, thank you! --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:20, 21 January 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing "Digital City Kyoto"

Hi,

thank you for reviewing and accepting my submission, Digital City Kyoto. I am very happy to see it live on Wikipedia.

I noticed on your user page that you have a deep connection with Japan. It was a great pleasure for me that someone with an understanding of Japanese context handled this review.

By the way, I actually traveled around New Zealand last year and had a wonderful time there. It feels like a nice coincidence to have my article reviewed by someone based in such a beautiful country!

Best regards

Toru Nomad717 (talk) 16:21, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

No problem at all, with the Doi links making it super easy to check sources, it clearly passed notability standards. Thanks for doing such a good job of it. It would be great to see you try to write some more articles - we are always short of new Japanese content, and it’s super tricky getting stuff through as not enough reviewers can read Japanese or are prepared to use the translation software.
Glad you enjoyed NZ too 😊 Absurdum4242 (talk) 16:24, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Review Request

Hello, I want to know if you can review my article Draft:Eliot K-8 Innovation School, I have finalized it with citations. Welovecontributorss [talk] 05:43, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi there, @Welovecontributorss - I reviewed your article. Unfortunately it was still a decline at this stage, but hopefully my comment will help you see what still needs done to give you the best chance of an acceptance in the future. Have a great day 👍 Absurdum4242 (talk) 06:39, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
I do agree, it does sound like an ad. Thanks for the feedback. I'll fix it as soon as possible. Welovecontributorss [talk] 07:08, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
one small question- would https://northend.page/search/node?keys=eliot+school be a good source? Welovecontributorss [talk] 10:25, 24 February 2026 (UTC)
@Welovecontributorss It’s honestly 50/50, and I would tend towards not counting it. It’s not a blog per se, but the about says it’s a volunteer group, but we don’t have names on the bylines, and don’t have any idea if they have an editorial policy, which are two things we usually look for. I also noticed a couple of articles bylined “AI created”, which makes me even less convinced. Weirdly, if they had just signed their name to articles, or if it was like a physical supermarket rag newspaper, it would probably count, but as is… Absurdum4242 (talk) 12:51, 24 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI