User talk:Adeel1143

Hello, Adeel1143, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate encyclopedic contributions, but some of your recent contributions, such as your edit to the page Masood Khan, seem to be advertising or for promotional purposes. Wikipedia does not allow advertising. For more information on this, please see:

• Policy on neutral point of view
• Guideline on spam
• Guideline on external links
• Guideline on conflict of interest
• FAQ for article subjects

If you still have questions, there is a new contributors' help page, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page. You may also find the following pages useful for a general introduction to Wikipedia:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and how to develop articles
• Help pages
• Tutorials
• Article wizard for creating new articles
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing Wikipedia! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Feel free to write a note on the bottom of my talk page if you want to get in touch with me. Again, welcome! Tacyarg (talk) 10:58, 9 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Tacyarg. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Masood Khan have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 07:18, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Adeel1143! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Masood Khan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Masood Khan, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. In addition, if you know, work for or represent Masood Khan, please don't edit the article directly. You can request changes on the article's Talk page.. Tacyarg (talk) 07:55, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

these are inputs are directly consulted with the person

there is nothing to advertise any thing just bio update please consider the changes as it was personally consulted by the person whose bio i am updating. Adeel1143 (talk) 08:33, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

what is promotional in it? Adeel1143 (talk) 08:40, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Hi Adeel1143! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Masood Khan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Masood Khan, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 14:22, 22 July 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Adeel1143. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Masood Khan, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the Edit Request Wizard), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 08:49, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

I don't have any relationship with the personality, i have edited the content with proper citations

you can check the Ciation of WPO reference to cross check the content .

I don't know what is promotion in it, please guide if there is something in it promotional I will change the content but in my view everything is ciated majority of the data is publically available on wpo and other forums.

please consider Adeel1143 (talk) 08:55, 15 July 2025 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Masood Khan. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see the Introduction to Wikipedia, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Masood Khan was changed by Adeel1143 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.952562 on 2025-07-16T04:34:57+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 04:34, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

thank you so much but i haven;t made any unconstructive edit

I have just change the picture, nothing conflicting Adeel1143 (talk) 04:58, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Tacyarg (talk) 07:56, 16 July 2025 (UTC)

Leaving edit warring notice again, in case you missed it before.

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:44, 5 September 2025 (UTC)