User talk:AderynMelyn

Hi AderynMelyn! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! fifteen thousand two hundred twenty four (talk) 22:57, 18 May 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to National Patriotic Front (Wales). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. SnowyRiver28 (talk) 23:59, 9 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Owain Williams (politician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bangor. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 22:08, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

Hi AderynMelyn. Thank you for your work on National Patriotic Front (Wales). Another editor, Klbrain, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

Thanks for creating this page for a significant Welsh nationalist movement; the prose is well-written and engaging; it's appropriately referenced and linked from elsewhere. Great!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Klbrain}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Klbrain (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2026 (UTC)

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Please help me with... Hello, I would like a second opinion on a dispute on the article Cymuned. The organisation was a Welsh nationalist language campaign group that emerged from Plaid Cymru in a dispute over English immigration in the 2000s. The article was effectively devoid of citations or much content until I recently started building it, but despite how extensively I've already written it detailing the group's activities, Helper201 has twice deleted the ideology section citing WP:SYNTH.

Having raised this in the talk section, they are arguing that Welsh language activism doesn't fall under Welsh nationalism, despite it falling under the Wiki's definition for it. The group also emerged from a major public debate concerning English immigration and anglicisation in Wales (from a Welsh nationalist party). This is discussed at length with citations at the start of the article, and they've also deleted anti-English sentiment (alleged). They haven't actually provided the criteria for either ideology they're working on, and I can't help but feel like this is profound pedantry. The group cooperated with hardline Welsh republican organisations in protests (mentioned in the article) and its rhetoric concerning anglicisation was more direct than anything Plaid Cymru is involved in. Admittedly, I'm still working on the article, but I can't help but feel like they're attempting to imply that only explicit references to independence constitute nationalism. Meanwhile, they've also deleted references to nationalism from the Welsh Language Society Wiki since, which officially supports independence. AderynMelyn (talk) 22:42, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

This is a question of Wikipedia:Verifiability, a core content policy of Wikipedia. Firstly, infoboxes are summaries of an article, so anything that you say in an infobox must come from the body of the article. And article content must be able to be verified by means of reliable sources, and if a statement is challenged, an inline citation must be added. What you are presenting is an argument for why Cymuned is nationalist, which is all well and good, but Wikipedia is not the place for that, because comments on a Wikipedia talk page are not reliable sources. Wikipedia will state that this organization is nationalist if and only if reliable sources do so. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 22:56, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Your edit to Draft:Mudiad Eryr Wen has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. thejiujiangdragon 🔥🐉 19:39, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Which content is copyrighted? AderynMelyn (talk) 19:50, 23 March 2026 (UTC)

Since looked at the revision history, understood. Thought it was acceptable as a block quote from the source website, alas. AderynMelyn (talk) 19:55, 23 March 2026 (UTC)