User talk:Afkllp - Wikiwand

This is Afkllp's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Compare100.com (January 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by GoldRomean was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Most of these sources come from compare100.com themselves, and, as such, are not independent

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Compare100.com and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

GoldRomean (talk) 23:18, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Hello, Afkllp! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! GoldRomean (talk) 23:18, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Compare100.com

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Compare100.com, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. - Excited A. It may be a good idea to look at this. 23:26, 22 January 2026 (UTC)

== Contest speedy deletion (G11) ==

I am contesting the G11 tag on this draft.

I understand the concern about promotional tone and have disclosed my conflict of interest on the talk page. The draft was written in a neutral, encyclopedic style describing the site's structure, history, categories and operations, with citations to the site's own publicly available pages (sitemaps, homepage) for verification of facts.

The article does not make promotional claims about superiority or savings benefits beyond basic description of function. It is comparable in tone and sourcing to other UK price comparison site articles (e.g. GoCompare, Uswitch stubs).

I am happy to make further changes to address neutrality concerns or add any independent sources that become available. Deletion at this stage would prevent collaborative improvement.

Thank you for your consideration. Afkllp (talk) 15:51, 23 January 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles