User talk:Akaal 5677

You have used sources that are either clearly noted as paid placement, unmarked press releases or marketing content, or blatant fake content farms which house unmarked SEO placement. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. These sources step far beyond those policies. Please carefully evaluate your references in the future, and ensure that you are in compliance with our mandatory paid editing disclosures. Sam Kuru (talk) 01:42, 8 April 2026 (UTC)

• siliconindia.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.siliconindia.com
• indianbusinesstimes.com: Linksearch en - meta - de - fr - simple - wikt:en - wikt:fr • Spamcheck • MER-C Cross-wiki • Reports: Links on en - COIBot - COIBot-Local • Discussions: tracked - advanced • COIBot-Local - COIBot-XWiki - Wikipedia: en - fr - de • Google: search • meta • Domain: domaintools • AboutUs.org • Live link: http://spam.indianbusinesstimes.com

Hello Akaal 5677. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Involute Metal Powder Technologies LLP, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Akaal 5677. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Akaal 5677|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Sam Kuru (talk) 11:15, 28 April 2026 (UTC)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Jas Kalra, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 11:37, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

A tag has been placed on Involute Metal Powder Technologies LLP requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company, corporation or organization that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MediaKyle (talk) 23:23, 15 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, why are you moving drafts into the main article space past AfC? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:17, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for your message. After reviewing the citations and doing additional research, I believe the subject meets Wikipedia notability guidelines. The company has reliable sources and is also listed on the Bombay Stock Exchange, so it qualifies for mainspace.@DoubleGrazing Akaal 5677 (talk) 07:24, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

With respect, you have been here for a few months and have 40-odd edits to your name, I really don't think you are experienced enough to judge what is or isn't notable. I just deleted the article on Shriram Properties. It had been declined at AfC by an extremely experienced reviewer, with a history of 20 years and 160,000+ edits as well as thousands upon thousands of AfC reviews. Yet, you seem to know better?

I would ask you not to move drafts into the main article space until you have accumulated considerably more experience and a much better understanding of our notability etc. policies. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:35, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Okay sir, I understand your point. Since you are more senior in this process, I may have misunderstood the procedure earlier.

Could you please help me by retrieving this article and moving it back to draft space? I have already put significant work into it, and I just need to make a few edits and improve some sections. After that, I will refine it properly and resubmit it for review. Akaal 5677 (talk) 07:37, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Let's first talk about your choice of subjects – how do you choose what to write about? You've created a couple of drafts on businesses, and a few on living people. There are literally billions of both those in the world, so why did you pick these ones, specifically? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:08, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Sir, basically I chose this draft for a few reasons. First, I am from Bangalore, South India, and I have personally heard quite a lot about Shriram Properties. I have also invested in this company in the stock market, which is why I started researching it in more detail.

During my research, I found the company quite interesting and notable. I am already a Wikipedia contributor, so I thought this page should be properly developed. When I checked, I saw that a draft already existed for this topic, so I decided to work on it instead of creating a new one.

Similarly, I have also seen some of these individuals on TV interviews, and I have even made notes from those appearances. That is why I feel I can contribute to improving these articles, since I already have some basic knowledge gathered through Google research.

My intention is simple: I only want to work on subjects I am somewhat familiar with or have researched properly. In the future, if I come across other notable people or companies through reliable sources or media coverage, I may contribute there as well. Akaal 5677 (talk) 08:14, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

I come across countless people and businesses on a daily basis, yet that doesn't inspire me to write Wikipedia articles about them. Is there perhaps something more to this than that?

The thing is, businesses and living people are prime targets for paid editing, ie. where someone has been asked to edit an article in exchange for a reward of some sort. This issue has been queried a couple of times already, but you've chosen not to respond. It's okay if you are being paid for these articles, you just need to be transparent about it, by making the necessary disclosure as explained in the #April 2026 section above. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:20, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

No sir, this is not a paid edit. If it were a paid contribution, I would have disclosed it, because I am aware of the guidelines.

In this case, it is purely based on my own effort and research. I have already edited and worked on the article properly, so I do have some understanding of the subject. However, if you still decide not to move it back to draft space, I will simply drop this project and work on something else instead—but it will feel like my effort has gone to waste.

That is why I am requesting you: if you could please move it back to draft space, I can continue improving it further. My intention is only to refine the article based on my research and contribute constructively.

There is no paid intention behind this—otherwise I would have clearly disclosed it in my profile as per the guidelines. Akaal 5677 (talk) 08:23, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Fine, I will move the deleted Shriram Properties article into drafts, on the condition that you put it through AfC review and not try to publish it yourself. (And if another new or anonymous user does that, I will assume some degree of collaboration.) It should only be published if and when approved by a competent reviewer. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:05, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

It is now at Draft:Shriram Properties Limited. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:07, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Ok thank you. Akaal 5677 (talk) 09:17, 18 June 2026 (UTC)

Which part of my message above (timestamp 09:05, 18 June 2026 (UTC)) did you not understand? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:17, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Next time you move this into the main article space past AfC, I will block you. Hope that's clear.

And another thing: please stop moving pages around, when you clearly don't know enough about it. You're causing extra work for others who have to come after you to clean things up. For clarity, we do not add disambiguators and other crud to page titles unless they are actually needed. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:25, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Shriram Properties. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it was moved unilaterally contrary to earlier agreement. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:19, 25 June 2026 (UTC)

You still have not adequately responded or taken action to the inquiry regarding your appearance as an undisclosed paid editor. If you make any additional edits without complying, you may be blocked from editing. Thilsebatti (talk) 20:39, 26 June 2026 (UTC)