User talk:Altamashngp

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: RSSDI (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:30, 23 October 2025 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, Altamashngp! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 11:30, 23 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India (October 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Fails WP:NORG, requires significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 02:20, 24 October 2025 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Research Society for the Study of Diabetes in India (November 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lovelyfurball was:
This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:
Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
 The comment the reviewer left was:
Needs more references from reliable, secondary sources. The sources must discuss the organization in depth.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lovelyfurball (talk) 19:02, 13 November 2025 (UTC)

CS1 error on Sunil S. Gupta

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Sunil S. Gupta, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:15, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Sunil S. Gupta moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Sunil S. Gupta. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you have a conflict of interest. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 10:40, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

ok thank you Altamashngp (talk) 11:14, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Information icon Hello, Altamashngp. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. aesurias (ping me in your reply, or I won't see it) (talk) 10:40, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sunil S. Gupta (January 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RangersRus was:
This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.
RangersRus (talk) 11:18, 29 January 2026 (UTC)

CS1 error on Baba Sailani

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Baba Sailani, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A generic name error. References show this error when author or editor name parameters use place-holder names. Please edit the article to include the source's actual author or editor name. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 07:40, 10 February 2026 (UTC)

Baba Sailani moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Baba Sailani. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing as a live article at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted it to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Khwiser (talk) 12:43, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for reviewing the article and for converting it to draft space. I appreciate your guidance.
I understand the concern regarding notability and sourcing. I will work on improving the draft by adding more reliable, independent secondary sources to better establish notability in accordance with Wikipedia guidelines.
Once the necessary improvements are made, I will resubmit the draft for review.
Thank you again for your time and support.
— Altamashngp Altamashngp (talk) 06:19, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

February 2026

Information icon

As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Altamashngp, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Altamashngp|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. Khwiser (talk) 12:44, 11 February 2026 (UTC)

Thank you for your message.
I would like to clarify that I am not being directly or indirectly compensated for my edits on Wikipedia. I do not have any financial stake, employment relationship, or paid affiliation connected to the subject of my contributions.
My edits were made in good faith with the intention of improving content quality and accuracy in line with Wikipedia guidelines. If any of my edits appear promotional, I am willing to revise them to ensure they fully comply with Wikipedia’s Neutral Point of View (NPOV) and conflict-of-interest policies.
Please let me know if any specific edits require correction.
— Altamashngp Altamashngp (talk) 06:16, 12 February 2026 (UTC)

Related Articles

Wikiwand AI