User talk:Andyashua

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit it after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Andyashua (talk) 19:37, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi Vanderwaalforces,

Thank you for your previous feedback regarding WP:NCORP and 'routine coverage.' I have significantly overhauled this draft to move beyond the 'dog bites man' news cycle of the founder's social media activities.

I have specifically addressed the notability concerns by:

Pivoting the focus: The article now centers on the MVOI’s 'open-ledger' philanthropic model, which is a departure from standard NGO operations in Nigeria.

Adding Analytical Sources: I included secondary analysis from Vanguard regarding the NGO's impact on national data privacy debates (the NDPC guidelines). This moves the coverage from 'routine' to 'significant/analytical,' as the organization's methodology is now a subject of expert critique.

Refining Tone: I have stripped the draft of promotional language and celebrity-focused 'fluff' to meet WP:NPOV standards.

I believe this version now demonstrates the organization's independent notability within the Nigerian non-profit landscape. I would appreciate a fresh look."

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

It appears you may have used a large language model (LLM), such as ChatGPT, in your edits. While LLMs are powerful, machine-generated text often contains serious flaws. They may introduce bias, errors, plagiarism, libel, or even hoaxes. Specifically asking an LLM to "write a Wikipedia article" can sometimes cause the output to be outright fabrication, complete with fictitious references. Editors must verify all LLM-generated text before using it in an article. Completely LLM-generated articles may be quickly deleted. If you are unsure about your wording, an alternative is to suggest it on the talk page for another volunteer to look at it. If you are creating a new article, you may use the Articles for Creation process to get feedback on your work.

As you get started editing Wikipedia, you may find the pages below to be helpful:

• Introduction
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

If you still have questions, there is the Teahouse, or you can click here to ask a question on your talk page, and someone will be along to answer it shortly. In your messages, please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and a timestamp. Happy editing! Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 20:52, 26 February 2026 (UTC)

Hi @Sarsenet, thank you for the welcome and the heads-up! I have been using some tools to help me structure the Wikipedia formatting (which I’m still learning), but I have personally verified every citation against the original news reports to ensure there are no fabrications or hoaxes. I am committed to following the five pillars and will continue to refine the draft to ensure it meets all manual of style requirements. Thanks for the guidance! Andyashua (talk) 10:14, 28 February 2026 (UTC)