User talk:Vanderwaalforces
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Please place new discussions at the bottom of the talk page. |
| This is Vanderwaalforces's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
| Please don't template me! Everybody makes mistakes, and this user finds user warning templates impersonal and disrespectful. If there's something you'd like to say, please take a moment to write a comment below in your own words. |
Scam Watch
Warning: There is an on-going scam targeting people who would like Wikipedia to have an article about them. See this scam warning for detailed information. If you've been scammed please send details to paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org to help others who could be future victims of this scam. |
Anosike
please review and assist in making updates to individuals page. notes are in this sandbox Africa Athletics (talk) 03:07, 1 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Africa Athletics Hi there. This is an AI generated article which I am not willing to spend my time on as it would likely be futile. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:23, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026 Administrator Elections – Discussion Phase

The discussion phase of the May 2026 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- May 8–12: Discussion phase (we are here)
- May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase
- Scrutineering phase
We are currently in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages are open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Discussion phase.
On 13 May, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for.
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
-- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:22, 8 May 2026 (UTC)
re: Shō Shitatsu gan
Hey! Thank you so much for your review on Shō Shitatsu. I wanted to let you know I have a number of other GANs on Ryukyuan monarchs up for review rn, and they all use a very similar set of sources (since there's such a small amount of info known about them). Since you have access to the Smits sources, you'd probably have an easier time reviewing them than most. I don't wanna cause more work for you if you don't want to ofc, but for the purposes of the Wikicup, you could probably rack up some of those GAN points without as much work as a randomly sampled review. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 06:14, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- You’re right, I actually plan on reviewing the ones I am able to. I have a couple GANs too if you don’t mind, I’d appreciate you looking too. :D Vanderwaalforces (talk) 07:49, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
"overly long"?
Hi, I"m thinking of adding an article to the Good article review pool, but saw that you don't want "overly long" articles.
The two articles I've currently got ready are:
Would either of them be within your comfort zone, or would both be "overly long"? If one of them is within your comfort zone, I could add it to the current pool, but if they're both too long, I can wait until the next pool forms. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:02, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- Hi Mr SB, double shuffle already reads interesting. I think we could go with that, thanks for reaching out. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- Great. I’ll add it to the pool today. Still working on some cites but that should be done soon. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
- Well well, it is surprising to see that my expectation (of being the one to review Double Shuffle) wasn’t exactly met, and I guess you had the same thoughts, lol. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 05:20, 11 May 2026 (UTC)
- Great. I’ll add it to the pool today. Still working on some cites but that should be done soon. Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 16:58, 10 May 2026 (UTC)
Wikimedia Foundation Bulletin 2026 Issue 9

Highlights
- Community Protection: Wikimedia Foundation secured Indonesian government’s commitment to user safety, privacy, and content integrity ahead of administrative registration in Indonesia.
- Stronger protections against bots: Wikimedia Foundation is replacing our CAPTCHA with a new approach to detect bad-faith activities without making things harder for users.
- Transparency Report: The Wikimedia Foundation has published its latest Transparency Report. This provides an overview of the work to protect Wikimedia projects and support the volunteer communities who handle the majority of content requests. Our users trust us to protect their identities against unlawful disclosure, and we take this responsibility seriously, granting only 1 of 30 requests for disclosure we received from July to December 2025.
Annual Goals Progress on Infrastructure
See also newsletters: Wikimedia Apps · Growth · Product Safety and Integrity · Readers · Research · Wikifunctions & Abstract Wikipedia · Tech News · Language and Internationalization · other newsletters on MediaWiki.org

- Reading Challenge: As part of the 25th birthday celebrations, Wikipedia Mobile Apps launched a limited-time feature, the 25-day reading challenge with Baby Globe. This challenge encourages a daily habit of reading one Wikipedia article. The goal is to motivate users to come back to the app regularly.
- Latest experiments: One upcoming experiment is introducing the Incident Reporting System (IRS) to help contributors easily find the right place to seek help when facing harassment or other issues. See all live, upcoming, and completed experiments in Product & Technology.
- Change in how new users are autoconfirmed: The account age for autoconfirmed users will now start from their first edit, not the registration date. This is to avoid exploitation by vandals. This change will only apply to wikis that require at least one edit for autoconfirmation.
- Organized Reading lists: All Wikipedia users with new accounts and those who activated the “automatically enable most beta features” option can now use the reading lists beta feature. This lets you save articles for later reading and keep it organized in one place for easy access.
- Thumbnail size preferences: Default thumbnail size preference for article content is now limited to three sizes: Small (180px), Regular (250px), and Large (400px). This change aims to improve performance and reduce strain on thumbnail services. Current preferences will shift to the nearest new size.
- Wikifunctions: To make the development of Abstract Wikipedia visible, the Foundation is requesting your input: which metrics about Abstract Wikipedia pages do you deem important?
- Tech News: The latest highlights from Tech News weeks 18 and 19 include improvements on Global Watchlist. See also the 62 community submitted tasks that were resolved over the last two weeks.
Annual Goals Progress on Volunteer Support
See also blogs: Global Advocacy blog · Global Advocacy Newsletter · Policy blog · WikiLearn News · The Wikipedia Library · list of movement events
- Annual Planning: We welcome your feedback on the main talk page for the 2026–2027 draft Annual Plan and many other places for the coming fiscal year.
- Wikimania: Wikimania is a joyful event. It is a chance to celebrate our community and projects, share ideas and information, build connections among Wikimedians, and inspire and develop future projects. If you and your community are interested in hosting Wikimania in 2028 and 2029 submit an expressions of interest.
- Community Conferences: The Foundation is supporting 15 strategic, diverse, and critical convenings taking place in 2026 and 2027, bringing together approximately 1800 Wikimedians across various regions, themes, and language communities.
- Don't blink: The latest developments from around the world about protecting the Wikimedia model, its people and its values.
- Wiki Loves Monuments: The winners of the 2025 Wiki Loves Monuments photo contest are announced.
Annual Goals Progress on Effectiveness
See also: Progress on the annual plan
- Enterprise: How CivicLens Uses Wikidata APIs to Make Civic Data More Accessible.
Board and Board committee updates
See Wikimedia Foundation Board noticeboard · Affiliations Committee Newsletter
- Wikinews closure: All Wikinews have been closed and switched to read-only mode. Content will remain accessible, but no new edits or articles will be able to be added. This closure was approved by the Board of Trustees of the Wikimedia Foundation following extended discussions.
- Affcom News: Read the latest issue of AffCom News (January-March 2026) to learn more about the latest news about the work of Wikimedia's Affiliations Committee.
- Model for affiliates to support contributors through tools: The Product and Technology Advisory Council has published draft recommendations on a model that affiliates can follow when contributing to the technical space.
- Grantmaking: The Global Resource Distribution Committee closed their request for feedback on three initial questions about grantmaking, and published their monthly update for April.
Other Movement curated newsletters & news
See also: Diff blog · Goings-on · Planet Wikimedia · Signpost (en) · Kurier (de) · Actualités du Wiktionnaire (fr) · Regards sur l’actualité de la Wikimedia (fr) · Wikimag (fr) · Education · GLAM · Milestones · Wikidata · Central and Eastern Europe · other newsletters
Subscribe or unsubscribe · Help translate
For information about the Bulletin and to read previous editions, see the project page on Meta-Wiki. Let foundationbulletin
wikimedia.org know if you have any feedback or suggestions for improvement!
MediaWiki message delivery 19:58, 12 May 2026 (UTC)
May 2026 Administrator Elections – Voting Phase

The voting phase of the May 2026 administrator elections has started and will continue until 19 May 2026 at 23:59 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/May 2026/Voting phase.
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- May 13–19: SecurePoll voting phase (we are here)
- Scrutineering phase
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies to vote has a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote totals cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's vote total during the election. The suffrage requirements are similar to those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for a few days, perhaps longer. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the results page (this is a good page to watchlist), and transcluded to the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a non-recall candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose), and a minimum of 20 support votes. Recall candidates must achieve 55.0% support. Because this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
Your Articles for Creation review on Ahmed Bakura Muhammad

Hello Vanderwaalforces. This is a reminder that your Articles for Creation review on Ahmed Bakura Muhammad is still marked as ongoing for over forty-eight hours. After seventy-two hours, Ahmed Bakura Muhammad will be returned to the review queue so that other reviewers may review the draft.
If you wish to continue reviewing the draft but need more time before the bot returns it to the review queue, you can place {{bots|deny=TenshiBot}} on the draft so you can continue your review. Also, if you do not want to receive these notifications, you can place the same template on your talk page. TenshiBot (talk) 09:39, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you bot... bleep blorp. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 09:42, 13 May 2026 (UTC)
New Page Patrol Newsletter - May 2026
Hello Vanderwaalforces,

Backlog update
At the time of this message, there are 15,282 articles and 32,951 redirects awaiting review.
After the January–February drive the article backlog was reduced to 15,179 articles and the redirect backlog to 19,053 respectively. Great job! However, both queues are growing rapidly and any additional reviews are highly appreciated.
2024 and 2025 NPP Awards

Hey man im josh and MPGuy2824 won the Redirect Ninja Master Award for 2024 and 2025 respectively, for reviewing the most redirects.
Overall in 2024, one Platinum, two Gold, eight Silver, 12 Bronze and 45 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 66 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year. In 2025, one Platinum, ten Silver, 13 Bronze and 38 Iron Barnstars were awarded. Additionally, 38 reviewers got the NPP barnstar for doing more than 100 reviews through the year.
BoyTheKingCanDance, Rosiestep, SunDawn, and Vanderwaalforces were inducted into the NPP Hall of Fame for having two separate years of 2,000+ article reviews.
January–February backlog drive
The experimental two-month long backlog drive concluded with 183 reviewers patrolling over 27,761 articles and 35,309 redirects, earning over 36,836 points. Congratulations to JTtheOG, who achieved first place with 6,484.6 points in this drive.
May backlog drive
An article-only backlog drive is currently underway. We are hoping to make a big dent in the backlog. You can read more about it or join at Wikipedia:New pages patrol/Backlog drives/May 2026.
PageTriage
An attempt was made to get the New Pages Feed to sort by date marked as reviewed instead of date created. However we had to revert it due to bugs. We may try again in the future. You can subscribe to the Phabricator ticket if you're interested in following along.
Reminders:
- You can access live chat with patrollers on the New Page Patrol Discord.
- Consider adding the project discussion page to your watchlist.
- To opt out of future mailings, please remove yourself here.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:38, 14 May 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Ohuede dynasty is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Ohuede dynasty is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gommeh -- Gommeh (talk) 00:24, 15 May 2026 (UTC)
Draft of Anthony Okon Placid
hello @Vanderwaalforces
History allows us to solve some problems in the present and future. I have worked on a draft which later was assented to by you as Benneth Igweh as Wikipedia:NPOL. I worked on Anthony Okon Placid page, incumbent czar of Nigeria's Public relations, an appointive position that gives an occupant of the office the responsibility to manage the image of Nigeria Police Force. It was surprising when the draft was turned down on failure to meet significant coverage Notability of living persons. It was ironically surprising again when the predecessor of Anthony Okon Placid Benjamin Hundeyin who is his junior in rank in the force but was appointed as Force PRO by IGP was assented on Wikipedia:NPOL, with coverage from the appointment. I thought it much to seek your perspective before resubmission. Thanks Twicebefore (talk) 00:18, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Twicebefore I didn’t do any GNG checks as I think the subject doesn’t pass, but the subject definitely doesn’t meet NPOL inherently. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:13, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
New article - Bindusagar
Hi request you to review this new article Bindusagar (film). It is an Odia film. You seem to have worked on content related to the region.
Thank you Filmy World (talk) 06:38, 16 May 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Ewedo is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Ewedo is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mr Serjeant Buzfuz -- Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 03:42, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Ewedo has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Ewedo has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Mr Serjeant Buzfuz -- Mr Serjeant Buzfuz (talk) 15:22, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
A Recent Blanking of a User Page
Regarding User:Tanha2024. I just wanted to know what was the reason behind the blanking? Cosmic840 had put a G11 Tag on the page. I believe an Administrator would see that the page was tagged and would have deleted it. Thanks Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Enćenćecasïdća the user page was a clear WP:UPNOT. I usually prefer blanking promotional user pages to G11ing them, and I assume an administrator would agree with me in this example. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:53, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- I see that. Just curious if there was a way to blank the rest of the page while keeping G11 intact? Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 17:56, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- I doubt if there’s a need to keep G11 intact, when the situation G11 is trying to solve has in fact been resolved. I mean, there’ll be no need to delete the user page by then. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:57, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Doesn't G11 create essentially a blank slate? An Administrator deletes it, I believe, means the visibility of the earlier revisions also goes away. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 17:59, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- It prevents the vast majority of people from seeing it. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 18:05, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, including the editor who originally wrote it, so sometimes blanking is preferable, because many newbies don't realize that what they've written is too promotional for our standards. In this particular case though, that's pretty blatant, so I've actually blocked the account and I'll G11. -- asilvering (talk) 19:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. And thanks for all that you do. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 19:46, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Yes, including the editor who originally wrote it, so sometimes blanking is preferable, because many newbies don't realize that what they've written is too promotional for our standards. In this particular case though, that's pretty blatant, so I've actually blocked the account and I'll G11. -- asilvering (talk) 19:44, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- It prevents the vast majority of people from seeing it. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 18:05, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- Doesn't G11 create essentially a blank slate? An Administrator deletes it, I believe, means the visibility of the earlier revisions also goes away. Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 17:59, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- I doubt if there’s a need to keep G11 intact, when the situation G11 is trying to solve has in fact been resolved. I mean, there’ll be no need to delete the user page by then. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 17:57, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
- I see that. Just curious if there was a way to blank the rest of the page while keeping G11 intact? Enćenćecasïdća (talk) 17:56, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Ohuede dynasty has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Ohuede dynasty has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gommeh -- Gommeh (talk) 23:05, 17 May 2026 (UTC)
Notification of administrators without tools
| Greetings, Vanderwaalforces. You are receiving this notification because you've agreed to consider endorsing prospective admin candidates identified by the process outlined at Administrators without tools. Recently, the following editor(s) received this distinction and the associated endearing title: | |
| |
Iranian village stubs
Hi, I came across the articles Darband, Rudbar, Matkuh and Karat Kallehlu which you reviewed last year, and I wanted to remind you that census records are insufficient to establish notability for populated places. All three of these were previously deleted as part of a large batch of poorly sourced stubs that turned out not to be villages at all. Hopefully we can stop things like this from slipping through the cracks and avoid these geostub debacles in the future. –dlthewave ☎ 06:08, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
- @Dlthewave I must admit that I have in fact stopped reviewing places articles unless they’re from my country or unless it is very obvious that it passes, this is the reason why I respect editors whose specialty is in WP:NPLACE, seriously haha. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:19, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Orhogbua is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Orhogbua is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 22:24, 19 May 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Orhogbua has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Orhogbua has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Alexeyevitch -- Alexeyevitch (talk) 10:44, 20 May 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Snap Judgments is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Snap Judgments is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 01:45, 23 May 2026 (UTC)
June 2026 GAN Backlog Drive
| Good article nominations | June 2026 Backlog Drive | |
| June 2026 Backlog Drive:
Do you want to become more experienced in the GA process?
Interested in taking part? You can sign up here. | |
| Other ways to participate: | |
| You're receiving this message because you have participated in a good article review this year or participated in the previous backlog drive. | |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:59, 25 May 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Snap Judgments has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Snap Judgments has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of TheNuggeteer -- TheNuggeteer (talk) 07:05, 30 May 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Oguola is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Oguola is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 21:44, 31 May 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Oguola has passed
Your good article nomination of the article Oguola has
passed; congratulations! See the review page for more information. If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Please also consider reviewing somebody else's nomination to help keep the backlog down. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of A.Cython -- A.Cython (talk) 22:05, 1 June 2026 (UTC)
Books & Bytes – Issue 74
Issue 74, March–April 2026
- New partnership: Swissdox
- User survey results
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team – 10:35, 2 June 2026 (UTC)
(This message was sent to User:Vanderwaalforces and is being posted here due to a redirect.)
Need your advice
Hello! Hope you're doing fine. I needed an advice from you regarding my AP rights permission discussion here - . After you had presented a different source analysis, the last comment was from Voorts - that he will let another admin review it. No second admin has reviewed it but suddenly MusikBot has archived the discussion. So, what should I do? Apply again or maybe undo that archiving bot edit? Thanks! BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 04:05, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- @BhikhariInformer I wonder why it was archived since it has not been completely treated, I think you should undo the archive. Vanderwaalforces (talk) 04:11, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
- Alright....then I'll undo it. Thanks! BhikhariInformer 📮 (Ping me or else I won't see it) 04:28, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
Your nomination of Ohen is under review
Your good article nomination of the article Ohen is
under review. See the review page for more information. This may take up to 7 days; feel free to contact the reviewer with any questions you might have. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Gommeh -- Gommeh (talk) 17:05, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
DCWC call for coordinators

Hey Vanderwaalforces, it's almost that time again! The Developing Countries WikiContest will be returning for its third year, and the coordinator team is looking for experienced content contributors willing to volunteer. The coordinators are responsible for keeping the contest running and its pages—including participants' submissions, the points leaderboard, and the list of eligible articles—updated.
If you would like to apply, please contact one of the coordinators; you may choose to do so privately if you wish: Arconning (talk · email), sawyer777 (talk · email), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · email). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 22:26, 3 June 2026 (UTC)
Talk:Battle of Mons Lactarius/GA1
Hi Vanderwaalforces, I'm one of the coordinators of the ongoing June GAN backlog drive. I see that you promoted this article but did not specify whether you spotchecked it during the review. Was that mistake or you forgot to do it? Cheers, Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 10:49, 4 June 2026 (UTC)
- @Vacant0 I in fact specified that spot check was done, Spot checks came back clean and… Vanderwaalforces (talk) 10:52, 4 June 2026 (UTC)


