User talk:Anhelina Biaschastnaya
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This is Anhelina Biaschastnaya's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: SBS (banking software company) (March 10)

- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:SBS (banking software company) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
![]() |
Hello, Anhelina Biaschastnaya!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! —pythoncoder (talk | contribs) 22:16, 10 March 2026 (UTC) |
AfC notification: Draft:SBS (banking software company) has a new comment

Paid editing

Hello Anhelina Biaschastnaya. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Anhelina Biaschastnaya. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Anhelina Biaschastnaya|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Theroadislong (talk) 18:42, 11 March 2026 (UTC)
- Hello Theroadislong. Thank you for your message. I have added the paid editing disclosure to my user page as requested. This affiliation was already disclosed on the draft talk page when the article was submitted through the Articles for Creation process. The draft was created in draft space and submitted for review accordingly.
- In any case, I have also added the disclosure to my user page to ensure everything is fully transparent. I have also received some feedback from the editor who previously reviewed the draft and will be happy to incorporate their suggestions when revising it.
- Please let me know if any further disclosure is required. Anhelina Biaschastnaya (talk) 16:39, 12 March 2026 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: SBS (banking software company) (June 6)

- provide significant coverage: discuss the subject in detail, excluding routine coverage like product launches, staff appointments, or financial reports and listings in databases or listicles;
- are reliable: from reputable outlets with editorial oversight;
- are independent: not connected to the subject, such as press releases, the subject's own website, or sponsored content.
Next steps
- Edit Draft:SBS (banking software company) to address the points above, making sure to publish any changes.
- When you are ready to resubmit your draft for review, click the Resubmit button.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it may be deleted.
Need help?
- For an overview of our policies and guidelines see Everything you need to know.
- You can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.
Scam warning
- If anyone asks you for money or payment to publish, protect, or restore a Wikipedia article or draft, it is a scam. Learn about scams on Wikipedia.
